← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

grammar mistake for <onAlarm> (repeatEvery can be used on its own)

From
Alex Yiu <>
Date
2005-11-20T00:46:08+00:00
ID
Thread
grammar mistake for <onAlarm> (repeatEvery can be used on its own)
Hi all,

Dieter kindly reports a grammar mistake for <onAlarm>.
<repeatEvery> can be used on its own, while the XSD and a small part of 
the spec text does not capture that properly.

I would like to remind people that: when I got the pen next time, I 
would fix this "repeatEvery" issue.


Thanks!


Regards,
Alex Yiu


Alex Yiu wrote:

> yes I guess I may have accidentally omitted the standalone nature 
> "repeatEvery" for "onAlarm", when I applied XSD changes. I think we 
> can fix the problem by applying minor changes to the XSD and gramar 
> notation (i.e. '*' '?' '+' ) in spec text. That can be done without 
> opening a new issue, I think.



Dieter Koenig1 wrote:

> Attribute "repeatEvery" can be used by itself (without "for" and/or
> "until", as introduced in the resolution of issue 43, but not correctly
> reflected in the XSD)
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →