Alexandre,
Thank you for catching the <targets><sources> order
problem.
For section 5.2, I have been thinking what would be a good approach to
do spec text in that section for a while.
We are supposed to give a short introduction of each activity in
section 5.2. But when the actual description of an activitiy is so
short, then the description in 5.2 and 10 are virtually the same.
<exit> is one of examples. Yes, I am open to trim the description
of those simple activities in section 5.2 further. Or, we can enrich
some description in section 10.
Anyhow, I don't have a strong preference here.
Thanks!
Regards,
Alex Yiu
Alexandre Alves wrote:
Hi,
I just
finished reviewing Alex's changes.
The spec is indeed much more readable, thanks Alex!
Just a few
comments:
-
In
section 10.2, we have the order of standard elements inverted, it
should be
<targets>…</targets><sources>…</sources>
instead of
<sources>…</sources><targets>…</targets>.
(btw, this problems was already there and was not a result of Alex's
modifications) I can fix this the next time I edit the spec (just
posting here
to get everyone's agreement).
-
We seem
to duplicate the (verbatim) definition of the exit activity in 5.2. and
10.10. It
seems that 5.2. generally has an initial explanation of some construct
and
section 10 follows up with the exact definition. For the exit activity,
we have
the same text in both places. Maybe we should just not mention exit at
all in
5.2 (like we don't do for rethrow), or if we do mention, just keep the
first
phrase instead of the complete definition to avoid future
synchronization problems
between both texts.
Rgds,
alex
From:
Mehta, Vinkesh (US
- Austin)
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, January
30, 2006
8:19 AM
To: Alex Yiu;
Cc: Alexandre Alves;
;
Subject: RE:
[wsbpel-spec-edit]
spec restructuring effort
I have fixed the TOC and
the formatting issue. I have
checked in the modified spec in CVS.
I am still reviewing
Alex's latest changes.
-Vinky
From: Mehta,
Vinkesh (US - Austin)
Sent: Fri 1/27/2006
9:05 AM
To: Alex Yiu;
Cc: Alexandre Alves;
;
Subject: RE:
[wsbpel-spec-edit]
spec restructuring effort
Thanks Alex.
- I will review your
updates.
- Fix TOC
- Fix any other
formatting issues
regards,
-Vinky
From: Alex Yiu
[mailto:]
Sent: Fri 1/27/2006
2:09 AM
To:
Cc: Alexandre Alves;
Mehta,
Vinkesh (US - Austin);
;
; Alex Yiu
Subject: Re:
[wsbpel-spec-edit]
spec restructuring effort
Hi all,
I have just checked in my changes into CVS.
Compared with the doc that that I sent out a couple of days ago, there
are a
number of other minor additional changes:
spilting the
references section and update some of references (Ron's resolution)
adding more
sub-section numbers to abstract process section
apply "observable
behavior" more consistently to the Introduction section (instead of
using both "observable" and "visible" in a mixed way)
Venky, I believe you are the next one to hold the pen to fix up TOC and
other
format problems only in MS-Word 2003.
Thanks!
Regards,
Alex Yiu
This message
(including any attachments) contains confidential information intended
for a
specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are
not
the intended recipient, you should delete this message.
Any disclosure,
copying, or
distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it,
is
strictly prohibited. [v.E.1]
