RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] member list in spec

From
"[arin, [ike"
Date
2006-08-15T17:16:35+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] member list in spec
Diane,

 

Few comments and/or questions:

 

1- Checking the list of editors with the Revision
history, it turns out three people in the revision list are not in the editors
list. I will add them to the editors list (Alejandro Gu瞵ar, Mark Ford, and Rania
Khalaf).

 

2- In the spread sheet the draft page,
contains several people that have never been members (they were or are observers).
To implement the motion, we will need at least few more rosters from the beginning
of the working group. I still not clear what to do in here.

 

3- Following the template, I will move the
Notices section before the table of content.

--

Regards,

Mike Marin 

From: Diane Jordan
[mailto:] 

Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 5:41
PM

To:
; 

Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] member
list in spec

 

Hi Mike, 

Second
question first  - the standard faults section should be Appendix A.  

On
the first question, we passed a motion on who to include in the member list.  (see:
 http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/email/archives/200606/msg00206.html
)  Here it is: 

This
is the methodology we decided on on today's call for determining inclusion in
Appendix J:.   

In the acknowledgement appendix, create 2 sub-sections: 1 listing current
members and voting members, and 2) listing anyone that was a member/voting
member in the past but is no longer (exlude all observers) 

This should be effective as of today and including any new members/voting
members 

Member affiliation on the ack list will be determined according to the
following:   

1 current affilaiton for those still on the roster 

2 affiliation shown on the roster at the time they were members for those no
longer on the roster 

3 personal request to have affiliation changed 

Also, anyone who requests to be removed from this list will be removed.   

Sally
has started the work of updating hte list of members.  Here is the last
email she sent on this with a spreadsheet she put together.  I need to go
back and check that we've picked up people who were members earlier and have
left the group/oasis but haven't had time to do that.    

Attached is a member list for inclusion in the specification. It reflects the
ground rules outlined in Diane's email of June 28. That date becomes the
dividing line for the 2 sheets 1) current members and 2) membership at some
time in the life of the committee. 

  

I have added people based on emails from Monica & Alex. I have not received
any emails from any one else. However Peter raised the issue of listing
multiple affliations. A decision needs to be made on that, including how many
affliations & what order (current with 1 prior affliation, the affiliation
started with and 1 or more additional ones). 

  

Based on my time on the TC the list has some anomolies in it but I have no
access to records to resolve questions. 

  

Sorry I had to leave the call early. Let me know if there is anything else I
can do. 

  

Sally 

Also,
if you have the time, could you verify that all the people who have made
updates to the spec per the change log are in the editors list please?  

Thanks.

Regards,
Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

 

  
  
"Marin, Mike"
  <> 

  
08/14/2006 07:21 PM 

  
  
  
   

    
    
To

    
    
    
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
    <> 

    
   

   

    
    
cc

    
    
    
 

    
   

   

    
    
Subject

    
    
    
RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Mike has the pen

    
   

  
  
 

  
   

    
    
 

    
    
    
 

    
   

  
  

  
 

  

Few other questions: 

  

1- With respect to updating the list of members, I understand
that I should take the list of members from the OASIS wsbpel roster and merge
it with the list in the specification. Is this the correct procedure? And
second, should I use the complete wsbpel roster including observers?

  

2- The current specification has section that starts with
letters (for example: “A. Standard Faults”). The OASIS template
uses the word Appendix in those cases (for example: “Appendix A. Standard
Faults”). Should I go ahead and do that change? 

--

Regards,

Mike Marin 

 

From: Diane Jordan
[mailto:] 

Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 6:23 AM

To: 

Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Mike has the pen 

  

Thanks Mike.  Please note the additional comment from Mary that's not
included in action item 62 - 

Apparently the Word file has lost its styles (page breaks, running footers,
etc.) Check out the word templates at docs.oasis-open.org/templates/ ... I
think you have the right bits, but the actual style information seems to have
been lost? Let me know if you help and I'll see what I can do. 

If the OASIS template doesn't provide enough information, let me know and we
can get back to her for specifics on what they want.   

After the call on Wed, we'll have to incorporate the xsd and then circulate to
the committee for approval of the candiate for public review.  

Regards, Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 08/14/2006 09:19 AM -----

 

  
  
"Marin, Mike"
  <> 

  
08/11/2006 07:15 PM 

  
  
  
 

  
   

    
    
To

    
    
    
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
    <> 

    
   

   

    
    
cc

    
    
    
  

    
   

   

    
    
Subject

    
    
    
RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] remaining spec editing
    work - pen is idle

    
   

  
  

    

  
 

  
   

    
    
  

    
    
    
 

    
   

  
  

  
 

 

I can take the pen, and do action item 62, starting on Monday afternoon. I can
have the pen for two days until Wednesday afternoon. I should be able to
complete action item 62 and update the member list. 

  

--

Regards,

Mike Marin 

  

From: Diane Jordan [mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:07 PM

To: 

Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] remaining spec editing work - pen is
idle

Importance: High 

 

Hi 

The pen is idle - any volunteers?   Other than the xsd and member list to
finish and incorporate, I think we're close to done.  I sent the last CD
to Mary at OASIS to have her review it and her comments are below (also see
action item 62 - only open one now!).     

Regards, Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 08/11/2006 04:01 PM -----

 

  
  
"Mary McRae"
  <> 

  
08/11/2006 03:55 PM 

  
  

  
 

  
   

    
    
Please
    respond to

    <>

    
   

  
  

  
  
  
  

  
 

  
   

    
    
To

    
    
    
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 

    
   

   

    
    
cc

    
    
    
  

    
   

   

    
    
Subject

    
    
    
RE: BPEL almost ready for public review

    
   

  
  

  

    

  
  

  
 

  
   

    
    
  

    
    
    
 

    
   

  
  

  
 

Hi Diane, 

Apparently the Word file has lost its styles (page breaks, running footers,
etc.) Check out the word templates at docs.oasis-open.org/templates/ ... I
think you have the right bits, but the actual style information seems to have
been lost? Let me know if you help and I'll see what I can do. 

m 

  

From: Diane Jordan [mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:42 PM

To: 

Subject: RE: BPEL almost ready for public review

Thanks Mary - here is the doc file that we're editing:   

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=19482&wg_abbrev=wsbpel

I'll put you on the agenda for this coming meeting.    

Regards, Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709 

 

  
  
"Mary McRae"
  <> 

  
08/11/2006 01:37 PM 

  
  

  
 

  
   

    
    
Please
    respond to

    <>

    
   

  
  

  
  
  
  

  
  

  
 

  
   

    
    
To

    
    
    
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 

    
   

   

    
    
cc

    
    
    
  

    
   

   

    
    
Subject

    
    
    
RE: BPEL almost ready for public review

    
   

  
  

    

  
  

  
 

  
   

    
    
  

    
    
    
 

    
   

  
  

  
 

Hi Diane, 

Thanks for asking :-) Let's do a couple of things. 

1. location: let's use a persistent URI such as http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/v2.0/

When it's ready, you upload it to Kavi and send me the link, and I'll upload to
docs.oasis-open.org 

2. Status: Please use the template boilerplate text as follows: 

This
document was last revised or approved by the WS-BPEL TC on the above date. The
level of approval is also listed above. Check the current location noted above
for possible later revisions of this document. This document is updated
periodically on no particular schedule. 

Technical
Committee members should send comments on this specification to the Technical
Committee’s email list. Others should send comments to the Technical
Committee by using the “Send A Comment” button on the Technical
Committee’s web page at www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsbpel.

For
information on whether any patents have been disclosed that may be essential to
implementing this specification, and any offers of patent licensing terms,
please refer to the Intellectual Property Rights section of the Technical Committee
web page ( www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsbpel/ipr.php.)

The
non-normative errata page for this specification is located at www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsbpel.

3. Update the Notices section to match the template
boilerplate: 

http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASIS_Specification_Template_v2-0_Legacy.html -- Notices section 

4. Remove section G (this is covered in the Status section) 

Is the TC authoring the spec in HTML? If not, I'll need that version as well. I
can't check the running footers in the HTML version. 

I should be able to make the meeting on the 16th; I don't think there's any
changes in the process that would impact BPEL going forward. The biggest change
is around new charter intake and specs will be required to be submitted in
XHTML (rather than HTML). Jamie should be getting the new version uploaded in
the next few days. 

Regards, 

Mary 

  

From: Diane Jordan [mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:02 AM

To: ; 

Cc: James Bryce Clark; Michael Winters; 

Subject: BPEL almost ready for public review

Hi Mary, 

We've just approved what we think is the public review -1 committee draft:  

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19511/wsbpel-specification-draft-Aug01-2006.htm

Would you please take a look at it and let me know if there are any formatting
issues remaining.   

Would it  be possible for you to spend an hour with the TC - either as
part of the next call on Aug 16 (8-10am pacific) or on another date - to go
over a few process questions?  I understand there are some new process
updates in progress - it would be helpful to have info on any that may effect
specs that are "in flight". 

Thanks. 

Regards, Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709