Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Fw: Question on AI 158

Hi, Diane, Thomas and Mark,

I have uploaded the spec text of rev 1.174 to the CVS and OASIS-OPEN.org

All the namespaces should be now synchronized as:

"http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/..." now, as a result of Issue
289.

And, I apply the consistent changes to Abstract Process Profile URIs as
well, which are:

  
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/process/abstract/ap11/2006/08

  
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/process/abstract/simple-template/2006/08

I guess people should be OK with it. 

BTW, OASIS-OPEN.org is semi-mail function now. Its website header and
footer and XSLT style are not found. So all the cosmetics effect of the
website are gone. But it still kind of functions. 

Here is the updated and latest zip file of 5 XSDs:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/document.php?document_id=19805

Here is the updated and latest spec text (MS Word file): 

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/document.php?document_id=19806

Thanks!

Regards,

Alex Yiu

Diane Jordan wrote:

  Resending to the group per Thomas's
request.  (Thomas will check on why you can't post directly).  
  

  Alex, 
  

  Please let us know if you see a
problem
with fixing all the occurrances to match the new namespace as Thomas
suggests.
 
  

  Thanks.

Regards, Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

  
  

  ----- Forwarded by
Diane
Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 08/17/2006 10:13 AM -----
  

  
    
      

        Thomas
Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
        
        
08/17/2006 05:14 AM
        

        
        
        
          
            

              
              
To

              
              Diane
Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
              
            

            

              
              
cc

              
              

              
            

            

              
              
Subject

              
              Fw: Question on AI
158
            

          
        
        

        
          
            

              
              

              
              

              
            

          
        
        

        
      

    
  
  

  

  Hi Diane,
  

  

  I've get an mailserver error because
I'm not allowed to post to list .
Can you re-send it for me? Thanks in advance.
  

  

Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

  

      Thomas Schulze

  
  

  ----- Forwarded by
Thomas
Schulze/Germany/IBM on 17.08.2006 11:12 -----
  

  
    
      

        Thomas
Schulze/Germany/IBM
        
17.08.2006 10:02
        

        
        
        
          
            

              
              
To

              
              Diane Jordan
<>
              
            

            

              
              
cc

              
              "Mark Ford"
<>,

              
            

            

              
              
Subject

              
              RE: Question on AI
158Link
            

          
        
        

        
          
            

              
              

              
              

              
            

          
        
        

        
      

    
  
  

  

  When changing the namespaces this
have
to done very carefully as pointed out by Mark. The current spec
contains
a mixture of the old URL namespaces like "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/business-process/"
and newer URN namespaces like "urn:oasis:names:tc:wsbpel:2.0:process:executable"
as documented in AI 158.
  

  

  I've additionally found some old
plnk
namespaces like "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/partner-link/"
(i.e. in chapter 5.1).
  

  

  IMHO, when Alex is applying Issue
289,
both kinds of outdated URIs, the old URL and the newer URN namespaces,
need to be changed to the final namespaces.
  

  

Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

  

      Thomas Schulze

  
  

  

  

  
    
      

        Diane
Jordan <>
        
        
17.08.2006 06:05
        

        
        
        
          
            

              
              
To

              
              "Mark Ford"
<>
              
            

            

              
              
cc

              
              Thomas
Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, <>
              
            

            

              
              
Subject

              
              RE: Question on AI
158
            

          
        
        

        
          
            

              
              

              
              

              
            

          
        
        

        
      

    
  
  

  

  

  

I think both of you have good points - the old namespace shouldn't
remain
in the spec.  It should be replaced with our current namespace. 

  

Mike, 

You applied 158 - can you confirm you did it consistently with the most
recent decisions on namespace? 

  

Thanks to all of you for your efforts to improve the quality of the
spec.
 

Regards, Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

  

  

  
  
    
      

        "Mark Ford"
<>
        
        
08/16/2006 05:07 PM
        

        
        

        
          
            

              
              
To

              
              "'Thomas
Schulze'"
<> 
              
            

            

              
              
cc

              
              Diane
Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
              
            

            

              
              
Subject

              
              RE: Question on AI
158
            

          
        
        

        

        
          
            

              
              

              
              

              
            

          
        
        

        
      

    
  
  

  

  

  

My concern is that the two occurrences of the older WS-BPEL namespace
in
the

current spec might get missed unless covered by an action item of their
own.

  

This is why I entered 158. If Issue 289 has changed the namespace then
by

all means use the new namespace, but I think 158 should remain.

  

  

-----Original Message-----

From: Thomas Schulze [mailto:] 

Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 4:08 PM

To: Mark Ford

Cc: Diane Jordan

Subject: Question on AI 158

  

  

Hi Mark,

  

I've just seen your AI 158: "Fix namespace for samples in Section
5. From

http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/business-process/ to

urn:oasis:names:tc:wsbpel:2.0:process:executable. This occurs in Section

5.1 and Section 5.2"

  

IMHO the namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:wsbpel:2.0:process:executable"
is

replaced with "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/process/executable"

since today's call. That was the intention of Issue 289 / AI 152. Right?

  

So, if you agree, can this AI be deleted?

  

Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

  

     Thomas Schulze