Re: [wsbpel] Issue 289 - final resolution

Hi Diane and Chris,

The issue mentioned by Chris has been addressed in my latest edit when
applying 289. 

It has been checked into CVS an hour ago. 

http://wsbpeltc.cvs.sourceforge.net/wsbpeltc/specifications/

or 

you can download it from there as well. 

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/document.php?document_id=19806

Chris ... thanks for the reminder.

Regards,

Alex Yiu

Diane Jordan wrote:

  Thanks Chris.
  

  

  Alex - do you agree with this?  Will
you be able to incorporate it when you apply 289?    
  

  

  We haven't planned another editing
pass
before the (hopeful) approval next week.  I'd like to have all the
known action items addressed in the version that we start the review
with
if possible.  Of course, its always possible there may be more
corrections
found that must be addressed before public review but we can hope for
the
best.  ;-)   
  

  

Regards, Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

  
  

  

  

  
    
      

        "Chris
Keller"
<> 
        
08/17/2006 03:26 PM
        
          
            

              
              
Please
respond to

<>

              
            

          
        
        

        

        
        
        
          
            

              
              
To

              
              Diane
Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
              
            

            

              
              
cc

              
              

              
            

            

              
              
Subject

              
              RE: [wsbpel] Issue
289 - final resolution
            

          
        
        

        
          
            

              
              

              
              

              
            

          
        
        

        
      

    
  
  

  

  

  Hi Diane,
  

   
  

  One place needs to change
for
this resolution is the following text in section 8.4.1 which states
that
the service-ref element is in the WS-BPEL namespace:  Not sure if
this warrants an action item, or just something not to miss in the 289
resolution application.
  

   
  

  “When using the
partnerLink
variants of from-spec and to-spec with a non-partnerLink variant of the
respective from-spec and to-spec in a <copy> operation, the
partnerLink
variants should be treated as if they produce an rvalue and lvalue of
an
EII whose [local name] is “service-ref” and [namespace name] is the
WS-BPEL
namespace.”
  

   
  

  This should be change to:
  

   
  

  “When using the
partnerLink
variants of from-spec and to-spec with a non-partnerLink variant of the
respective from-spec and to-spec in a <copy> operation, the
partnerLink
variants should be treated as if they produce an rvalue and lvalue of
an
EII whose [local name] is “service-ref” and [namespace name] is the service
reference namespace (full URI here?).”
  

   
  

  - Chris
  

   
  

  

  

  From: Diane Jordan
[mailto:]
  

Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:40 PM

To: 

Subject: [wsbpel] Issue 289 - final resolution
  

   
  

  

Issue 289 was resolved as proposed in http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/email/archives/200608/msg00051.html
  

with the following changes: 

friendly amendment:  Change sentence to:  " The
WS-BPEL XML Schemas offer supplementary normative XML syntax details,
such
as details regarding extensibility of a WS-BPEL process definition, as
long as those XML syntax details do not violate explicit normative
descriptive
text. 

Also, use cap S for  schema to be consistent with rest of spec 

(Mark to open action item for one other case)
  

friendly amendment drop sentence:  A
summary of the additional constraints can be found in Appendix B.
Static
Analysis requirement summary.
  

   

  

Regards, Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709