RE: [wsbpel-uc] Re: 1st Candidate examples of deliverables

From
Harvey Reed <>
Date
2003-09-24T14:27:16+00:00
ID
003c01c382a8$0c9b5950$
Thread
RE: [wsbpel-uc] Re: 1st Candidate examples of deliverables
Sid,

 

This is as good a place/time to discuss as
any. 

 

Considering that the whole point of BPEL is
to orchestrate operations as defined in a WSDL, I am puzzled as to why WSDL is
out of scope. However, it could be that I am misunderstanding what you are
advocating. If you can offer up a concrete sample of use case deliverables that
will help de-mystify issues. Even a rough skeleton will add lots of value J

 

Is there any way to kick out such a sample
soon, so together, we can comment, critique, and iterate to produce
deliverables by this Friday?

 

Thanks so much!

 

++Harvey

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Sid Askary
[mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003
5:57 PM

To: Harvey Reed; 'Sally St. Amand'

Cc: 

Subject: [wsbpel-uc] Re: 1st
Candidate examples of deliverables

 

Harvey,

I am working on a sample as we speak.  I would like to discuss the list
that you have at some point.  For example, as per my email, I think
examples are not use cases.  Therefore, schema's, WSDL, etc. are not
initially in scope.

Sid.

At 02:44 PM 9/22/2003, Harvey Reed wrote:

Sally, Sid,

 

The
proposal is to deliver candidate examples of deliverables to the UC group by
COB Friday. Lets say by 5pm ET. Per what we have discussed prior, I think the
list is:

 

1.     
Entities with
descriptions, that own 

2.     
Actors (or better
name) which are web services, that expose 

3.     
WSDL to describe
operations that exchange messages that have 

4.     
Schemas, all of
this used by 

5.     
BPEL use case explanative
text, (using template?)with 

6.     
Executable BPEL, and
possibly, 

7.     
Abstract BPEL 

 

Lets
also take into account issues/concerns that Sid is writing up (please reply and
paste in), and any thoughts from Sally. Once we agree on the list of
deliverables, we can make outlines of the deliverables we can agree on, then
fill one coherent example in and submit back to the UC for comment, then the TC
for demonstrating progress.

 

So the
next action item is for Sid to reply with his thoughts that he is writing up,
and we can drive from there&

 

Harvey
Reed

Technical
Product Manager

Sonic Software

www.SonicSoftware.com

781-999-7027