Re: [wsbpel] Proposed Motion

From
"Eanny van der Qijn"
Date
2003-05-16T21:07:47+00:00
ID
028201c31bf0$e9677b80$f794690a@HEN3RY
Thread
Re: [wsbpel] Proposed Motion
Donald Steiner wrote:
> ...
> Personally, I would like to see the original submitters publish a joint
> licensing agreement that is automatically offered to anybody using the
> specs. (Note, this does not say what the details of said license
> agreement would be, it would just make things un-bureaucratic and
> transparent as far as the formalities are concerned.)

that would work for me.  personally, i have concerns not only about
implementation, but also about further developing the spec without further
understanding of legal implications.

danny