← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Issue - 99 - New issueTriggering activities for abstract processes

From
ws-bpel issues list editor <>
Date
2004-03-03T11:49:28+00:00
ID
Thread
Issue - 99 - New issueTriggering activities for abstract processes
This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list.
The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the 
OASIS WSBPEL TC pages
on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent document
with the title  in the 
"Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list
- the next posting will include this issue.
The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at 
this constant URL.

Issue - 99 - New issueTriggering activities for abstract processes
Status: open

Area: Abstract processes

Date added: 3 Mar 2004

Submitter: Ivana Trickovic

Date submitted: 03 March 2004

Description: The current version (BPEL4WS v1.1, May 2003) specifies that each process (either executable or
abstract) must contain at least one "start activity" (start activity is either a receive activity or a pick
activity that receives a message and is annotated with the createInstance attribute set to "yes" to indicate
that the occurrence of that activity causes a new instance of the process to be created).

This restriction makes less sense for BPEL abstract processes. Because of this restriction, the abstract
process of the party that initiates a message exchange must be extended and a start activity must be
introduced (also additional WSDL elements, such as port types, messages, must be defined as well as partner
link type). But how the initiating process is started is an implementation detail and does not have to be
included in the BPEL abstract process since it is not part of the "business protocol".

Submitter's proposal: Allow the invoke activity to be used as the start activity for abstract processes. 

Changes: 3 Mar 2004 - new issue

To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the 
 list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure
the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 99 - [anything]" or is a reply
to such a message.

To add a new issue, 
see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread