Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 48 - Proposed Resolution

BPEL defines today how to use a base language, XPATH 1.0, this provides 
the foundation for portability. But efforts such as XQUERY and other 
similar languages are out of scope for BPEL. Before Issue 13 it wasn't 
even possible for someone to come along later and add in support for 
these languages. But with Issue 13 it is now possible. Therefore I think 
the issues I raised in the post you pointed to should be taken up by 
groups that want to do things like add in XQUERY support in the future. 
But this group, I believe, has done it's job in this area by providing 
well defined extensibility points.

	Yaron

Danny van der Rijn wrote:

> i don't see the connection.  how does changing syntax to allow for other
> languages address the issues you raised in this note:
> 
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200308/msg00130.html
> 
> danny
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yaron Y. Goland" <>
> To: "wsbpeltc" <>
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 8:19 AM
> Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 48 - Proposed Resolution
> 
> 
>  > With the passage of Issue 13 I no longer believe that issue 48 is
>  > relevant and so propose that it be closed as 'no change to the spec'.
>  > Thanks,
>  > Yaron
>  >
>  > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
> the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>  >
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the 
> OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>