Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [wsdm] WSDM MUWS 1.1 Part 2, Final review and vote for CD

From
Vaughn Bullard <>
Date
2006-03-09T15:35:05+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsdm] WSDM MUWS 1.1 Part 2, Final review and vote for CD
Ah hah.  Well maybe once we vote on the docs, we can 
make that quick change then upload.

 

:Vaughn

  

  
  From: Wilson, Kirk D 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 10:29 
  AM
To: ; Heather Kreger
Cc: 
  
Subject: RE: [wsdm] WSDM MUWS 1.1 Part 2, 
  Final review and vote for CD

  

  

  
I think it needs to 
  something like wsdm-muws1-1.1-spec-cd-01 and wsdm-muws2-1.1-spec-cd-01.  
  The MUWS Part number should be part of the main file name and both specs are 
  cd-01.  (But now they may be cd-10 J.)

  
 

  

  
Kirk 
  Wilson
Architect, 
  Development

  
Office of the 
  CTO

  
603 
  823-7146

  
 

  
-----Original 
  Message-----
From: Vaughn 
  Bullard [mailto:] 
  
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 
  2006 10:23 AM
To: 
  Wilson, Kirk D; 
  'Heather 
  Kreger'
Cc: 
Subject: RE: [wsdm] WSDM MUWS 1.1 Part 2, 
  Final review and vote for CD

  
 

  
Just an 
  oversight...Needs to be wsdm-muws-1.1-spec-cd-02.

  
 

  
Thanks,

  
Vaughn

  
 

  
 

  
    
 

    

    
    

    
From: 
    Wilson, Kirk D [mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 10:15 
    AM
To: Heather 
    Kreger
Cc: 
    
Subject: RE: [wsdm] WSDM MUWS 1.1 Part 
    2, Final review and vote for CD

    
I find 
    the “cd-02” misleading, then.  I thought that was supposed to be the 
    Revision number related to the stage of development of the doc.  Based 
    on the way I read the Artifact Identification spec. WSDM-MUWS-1.1…-cd-02 
    would supersede WSDM-MUWS-1.1…cd-01 by being a later version of the latter 
    document.

    
 

    
Changes to the 
    schema can be directly in the text of Appendix A, since it is just a matter 
    of deleting a set of lines (lines 1814-1823 in A.hk to be 
    precise).

    
 

    

    
Kirk 
    Wilson
Architect, 
    Development

    
Office 
    of the CTO

    
603 
    823-7146

    
 

    
-----Original 
    Message-----
From: Heather 
    Kreger [mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 10:04 
    AM
To: Wilson, Kirk 
    D
Cc: 
    
Subject: RE: [wsdm] WSDM MUWS 1.1 Part 
    2, Final review and vote for CD

    
 

    

cd-02 indicates its Committee 
    Draft of Part 2,  the *A.,doc document is Vaughns edits. 
    

In the A.hk.doc I addressed the 
    issues in my note (additional changes) and left it as markup so everyone 
    could see and we can review what I've done.  I implemented Tom's 
    SequenceNumber and made some changes to how Vaughn addressed some of your 
    comments on the WS-Addressing reference parameters and the relationship 
    events. 

Whew!  We should review and 
    approve the A.hk.doc document today. 

Do you need to 
    update the schema appendix in MUWS Part 1 or 2 to fix the copy/paste 
    error? 

Heather Kreger
STSM, Web 
    Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and 
    JMX: Building Manageable Systems"

919-543-3211 (t/l 
    441)  cell:919-496-9572

    
      
      

        
          
"Wilson, 
          Kirk D" <> 
          

          
03/09/2006 07:04 
          AM 

        
          
            
            

              
                
To

              
                
Heather 
                Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, 
                <> 

            

              
                
cc

              
                
 

            

              
                
Subject

              
                
RE: [wsdm] WSDM 
                MUWS 1.1 Part 2, Final review and vote for 
              CD

          
 

          
            
            

              
                
 

              
                
 

          

    

I must say I’m 
    thoroughly confused by what version of what MUWS Part I need to review. 
     What is the relationship between the file ending in “A.hk” and the one 
    uploaded ending just in “A”?  Are they the same?  The situation is 
    not helped by the fact that the file names don’t designate the MUWS part (or 
    is that what the “cd-02” is meant to do? 
  
    
Kirk 
    Wilson
Architect, 
    Development 
Office of the 
    CTO 
603 
    823-7146 
  
-----Original 
    Message-----
From: Heather 
    Kreger [mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 
    12:38 AM
To: 
    
Subject: [wsdm] WSDM MUWS 1.1 Part 
    2, Final review and vote for CD 
  

Hi, 
    
Its taken a little longer than expected to finish up the CD candidate 
    for MUWS 1.1. Part 2 due to technical difficulties.  I believe this 
    draft to include all agreed on changes and responses to Kirks comments on 
    the previous draft.   

Here's our 
    agenda for todays call: 
1. Roll 
2. 
    Review naming conventions for documents 
3. MUWS 1.1 
    Part 2 changes review 
4. Vote MUWS 1.1 to 
    Committee Draft 
CELEBRATE! 
    

Changes made in this draft 
    of MUWS 1.1: 

Changes approved from last 
    call: 
1. 
         replace section 2.5.1.2 470-519 with those 
    in Tom Studwells posting 470-519 for Correlation Properties with fixes in 
    schema. 
2.     
     Rename to CorrellationProperties to 
    EventCorrellationProperties 
3.      Font size 
    508-520 
4.     
     Deleting diagram at 623 
5.      Fix notification 
    references 
6.     
     1404 – add statement ‘For releationships as a stand 
    alone resource, Self should not be specified.’  (Heather) 
7.     
     2002 make Sequence an attribute  (Heather) 
    
8.     
     Remove *PropertiesType declarations  (Kirk to 
    change) 
9.     
     Add CopySection with element declarations in WSDL (Kirk 
    to change) 
10. 
     GED for Self element (Kirk to change) 

Other changes made based on 
    Kirks editorial commentts: 
1. Rewrote 136-142 to align with current 
    WS-RF and WS-A  (I readded a paragraph I think was mistakenly 
    deleted) 
2. Reformatted 2.5.1.4 
    Message Catalog section 
3. 4.1.3  removed ref 
    to 'manageaable relationships' and put description of topics back in, I 
    think I've fixed Kirk's origional concern about the topic 
    name. 
4  minor space and '.' 
    removal throughout.

The XML schema and WSL were 
    correct and did not need to be updated or reverified. 
    

Heather Kreger
STSM, Web 
    Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and 
    JMX: Building Manageable Systems"

919-543-3211 (t/l 
    441)  cell:919-496-9572
Next in thread → Next in month →