No objections from me.. I think the formatting suggestion is a good start
and then we should all take some stabs at adding definitions we find to be
relevant. After a gathering phase we can then enter a refining phase of the
glossary. But first we need to start gathering or defining our relevant
terms.
Dan Gisolfi
To: Dan Gisolfi/Somers/IBM@IBMUS, <>
cc:
Subject: RE: [wscm] Motion for a WSIA Glossary of Terms
Dan -
Looks like we can and probably should reuse some of the formatting and
glossary entries you have found. I was wondering if we should check some
of
the other TC's to see if we can gather additional items that may help
provide a wider set of definitions. I believe I saw some references to the
terms producer/consumer within some of the documents from the XACML.
Unless
there are objections, I will try and see if I can get some defs out of
their
docs relating to the p/c clarification.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Gisolfi [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:47 PM
To:
Subject: [wscm] Motion for a WSIA Glossary of Terms
Recalling John's comments in the "Consumer" breakout session this week,
namely "was there other work that we could borrow terms from for
glossary/semantic/vocabulary purposes for both internal and external
communications". I spotted an effort in another OASIS TC that I think
demonstrates an approach whereby an initial delivery/artifact of the group
(TC) is to produce a glossary of terms.
To this end, I suggest taking a peak at the SPML Glossary attached. It has
few items/terms which we may be able to "consume" but I think it offers us
a good model for an initial roadmap milestone.
I think such an item was captured as part of the mtg minutes but I was
unsure if we actually agreed on a specific deliverable.
thoughts?
(See attached file: draft-anand-glossary-02.doc)
Dan Gisolfi
