Title: Message
Sorry, forgot the other list...
-----Original Message-----
From: Eilon Reshef
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002
3:32 PM
To: 'Rich Thompson'
Cc:
Subject: RE: [wsrp] WSXL paper
update
Looks very interesting. I had
some questions regarding the WSXL document:
Am I correct in my understanding that the framework
assumes that the Producer has a stateful service (portlet) end, that can store
and return the property values? Is this something you have been debating
internally? Did you also consider a hybrid model in which the Producer doesn't
have to store the property list, but rather receives it in the
getOutput/invokeAction calls, but still able to publish a schema for those
properties? Were there any interesting other approaches and pros and
cons?
Regarding properties, did you envision that any schema
would be legal, or did you envision a model where the scheme is constrained in
some way (e.g., name value pairs, ...)?
You chose to have a semi-dynamic model for adaptation
points, so they are not specified as part of the WSDL (makes sense, since they
might change with versions of the implementation), but are the same for all
instances (i.e., not on a per-instance basis). Did you have discussions around
cases where the WSXL service is itself highly customizable or personalized
(based on user / configuration / sequence of pages / properties) so that the
page layout changes significantly, and how to address that within the
framework?
Eilon
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:17
PM
To:
Subject: [wsrp] WSXL
paper update
Here is the update that will be appearing soon on
developerWorks:
(See attached file: WSXL_Position_Paper.zip)
