Hi Rich,
I think the goal of this committee is to coordinate between the different
SECURITY committees (SAML, XACML, XCBF, Provisioning Services, Rights
Language). Since WSRP/WSIA are not security committees, I believe we do not
need to be represented at this point.
(We should be following the work of those committees however).
Yossi.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:16 PM
To: ;
Subject: [wsia] [wsrp] [security] New security TC
See http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security-jc/ for information on
the new "Security Standards Joint Committee" at OASIS. Here is a copy of
the charter:
Charter
Statement of Purpose: To coordinate the efforts of the OASIS security
TCs. Initial members of the JC will be the OASIS TCs listed below, but
other related TCs may be invited to join later.
List of deliverables with projected dates: None; the purpose of this JC
is coordination of individual TCs' technical work only, and has no
anticipated deliverable.
My reading of this is that it is an effort to reuse security standards work
rather than re-invent. The key question is whether either WSIA or WSRP
needs to be represented on the TC.
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
