I'm not sure the concept of a Handle should be pushed all the way back to
that of an _implementation_ entity, but agree that it is a solution rather
than a requirement. I think the only issue with the original wording is
what to consistently call the interactions between an instance of the
Consumer and an instance of the Producer.
Gil Tayar
<Gil.Tayar@webcol To: "'Alan Kropp'" <>,
lage.com> "''" <>
cc:
05/05/2002 02:29 Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E902]
AM
A Handle (an idea which I like) is more of an _implementation_ entity, and
not necessarily a _requirement_ entity.
My question is - what is wrong with E902?
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Kropp [mailto:]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 04:49
To: ''
Subject: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E902]
E902
The specification should support both implicit and
explicit
creation of a stateful connection between Consumers and Producers. Means by
which the Consumer gains access to the stateful connection must be well
defined. Debate: SR, GT, SA, AK, RT. Also, E903-4.
I think we can introduce the concept of a Handle:
E902
The specification should support both implicit and explicit creation of a
stateful connection between Consumers and Producers. The Producer
signifies
that a connection is stateful by creating and returning a Handle, an opaque
reference for use by the Consumer to refer to the stateful interaction
between an End User and the Producer.
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
