Please delete the word "whatever" and substitute "any." We didn't
specify terseness of language. Should we?
Suggested:
>R414 [Functionality]
> The Consumer SHOULD adhere to any property validation
> constraints the Producer has specified. The Consumer MAY specify
> additional property validation constraints.
At 8:01 AM -0400 5/6/02, Rich Thompson wrote:
>I think the original intent was that a Consumer may add property validation
>constraints to those specified by the Producer (likely a 'republish'
>requirement). Suggest:
>
> R414 [Functionality]
> The Consumer SHOULD adhere to whatever property validation
> constraints the Producer has specified. The Consumer MAY specify
> additional property validation constraints.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Eilon
>Reshef
> <eilon.reshef@webc To: "'Alan
>Kropp'" <>,
> ollage.com>
>
>
>cc:
> 05/04/2002 06:24 Subject: RE:
>[wsia][wsia-requirements][R414]
>
>PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I agree (except that I would change must to should...).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Kropp [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:10 PM
> To: ''
> Subject: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R414]
>
>
>
> R414 [Functionality?]
> The Consumer should have a means to override property
>
> validation constraints and logic at each of its levels.
>
>
> Well, the Consumer could certainly do this, but the Producer is
> likely to
> reject such overriden values as invalid! I think the Consumer must
> be bound
> by whatever property validation schema the Producer enforces:
>
>
> R414 [Functionality]
> The Consumer must adhere to whatever property
> validation
> constraints the Producer may specify for any of its properties.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
--
