FW: [soa-eerp-comment] WSQM TC's comments

Dear members

 

I am forwarding the email of SOA EERP TC’s response to our TC’s
comments about SOA EERP specifications.

 

In the next meeting, we will discuss about this one.

 

Best regards

Junghee Yun

 

From: Andy Lee [mailto:] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 3:00 AM

To: ; 

Cc: 

Subject: Re: [soa-eerp-comment] WSQM TC's comments

 

Junghee,

Thank you for bring this issue to our attention.  WSQM
is heading the right

direction in addressing the Web Services quality issues with the upcoming

Web Services Quality Factors (WSQF).  I agreed with you that the SOA-EERP

Business Quality of Service (bQoS) specification can be aligned with your

WSQF, and two specifications can be aligned well.

You are welcome to use our BQoSPrice and BQoSPerformance
elements defined

in our bQoS specification with the namespace of

“http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/soa-eerp/bqos/200903”,
as these two

elements are defined as global elements in the schema and can be used

independently.

Also, these two elements all have extension points like the
following in

the XML Schema:

<xsd:any namespace="##other"
processContents="lax" minOccurs="0"

maxOccurs="unbounded"/>

We see no need for additional extension element for now.

In other words, both existing BQoSPrice and BQoSPerformance
elements in the

bQoS schema can be re-used in your WSQF to represent any sub-factors about

Price and Performance without any changes. Our SOA-EERP TC would like to

see our elements to be used in other specifications.

In our future version, we can work together to have a
better integration

between SOA-EERP Business Quality of Service specification and yours Web

Services Quality Factors. For example, we can reuse elements in WSQF and

reference them.

Again, thanks for your comments, and looking forward in
working with your

TC for future version of EERP specification.

Best regards,

Andy Lee,

SOA-EERP TC Co-chair