Tom Maguire wrote:
>Tom,
>
>I absolutely agree with the sentiment. The stated intent of the WSRF TC is
>to wait until WS-Addressing goes to recommendation status before taking
>WSRF specs to standard. At that point the reference:
>http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core will be the correct one.
>Are you suggesting that we update the WSRF specs after Public Review to
>point to the reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331?
>
>
I would rather wait until after the Public review to make this
decision. It depends on the stability at that time of both wsrf and ws
addressing.
I was referring in my email below to the current versions of the document.
Tom Rutt
>I am not sure what that would accomplish, certainly the TC needs to be
>aware of any changes that occur in WS-Addressing core from 20050331 to
>recommendation status, but I think the reference in the PR is fundamentally
>expressing the intent of the standard.
>
>Tom
>
>Frey’s Law: “Every 5 years the number of architecture components double and
>the ability to comprehend them halves”
>
>
>Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
>there is nothing left to take away. – Antoine de Saint-Exupery
>
>
>T o m M a g u i r e
>
>
>STSM, On Demand Architecture
>
>
>Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
>
>Tom Rutt <> wrote on 06/20/2005 08:24:08 AM:
>
>
>
>>Tom Maguire wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I looked at this when it was brought up on the OGSA call. My (perhaps
>>>uninformed) view is that the correct reference is
>>>http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core given that when WS-Addr goes to
>>>recommendation status this is where the recommendation specification
>>>
>>>
>will
>
>
>>>reside. In other words, that URL 'is' the stable reference for the
>>>recommendation level.
>>>
>>>Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>We need to be careful here. We are using namespaces in our wsrf specs
>>which are defined in the last call spec
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331
>>
>>This is where these namespaces are defined. When the ws addressing core
>>spec progresses, there could be differences in the schema, which
>>would result in a different namespace applying. We have to ensure that
>>we correctly reference the proper version of the ws-addressing core
>>to avoid confusion, since both our wsrf spec and their ws-addressing
>>specs are still evolving.
>>
>>Tom Rutt
>>Fujitsu
>>
>>
>>
>>>Frey’s Law: “Every 5 years the number of architecture components double
>>>
>>>
>and
>
>
>>>the ability to comprehend them halves”
>>>
>>>
>>>Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
>>>there is nothing left to take away. – Antoine de Saint-Exupery
>>>
>>>
>>>T o m M a g u i r e
>>>
>>>
>>>STSM, On Demand Architecture
>>>
>>>
>>>Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>> David Snelling
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>> <David.Snelling@U
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>> K.Fujitsu.com>
>>>
>>>
>To
>
>
>>> WSRF <>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>> 06/19/2005 02:22
>>>
>>>
>cc
>
>
>>> PM
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>Subject
>
>
>>> [wsrf] Fwd: WS-addressing
>>>
>>>
>reference
>
>
>>> in WSRF-RP
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>Folks,
>>>
>>>The following came in from a Fujitsu colleague. I this an issue or is
>>>it just another statement of the fact that WS-A references will need to
>>>be fixed after Public Review?
>>>
>>>Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>We find that the current WS-addressing reference in WSRF-RP 1.2 CD
>>>>is inappropriate. In its normative reference section on page 44,
>>>>It refer to WS-addressing at "http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core."
>>>>This address is always for the latest version and will be updated
>>>>in the future. You should refer to
>>>>"http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331" instead.
>>>>
>>>>Namespaces on page 7 says that wsa is
>>>>"http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing." I think it's better to
>>>>update the reference maybe by errata?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>--
>>>
>>>Take care:
>>>
>>> Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK . Fujitsu . com >
>>> Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe
>>> Hayes Park Central
>>> Hayes End Road
>>> Hayes, Middlesex UB4 8FE
>>>
>>> +44-208-606-4649 (Office)
>>> +44-208-606-4539 (Fax)
>>> +44-7768-807526 (Mobile)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>--
>>----------------------------------------------------
>>Tom Rutt email: ;
>>Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt email: ;
Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
