Personally I odont believe in this rush to OASIS Standards unless
someone is using (which implies some implementation) the specs up for
vote, previous versions don't count IMHO.
Martin.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom Rutt [mailto:]
>Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 4:10 PM
>To: David Snelling
>Cc: Martin Chapman;
>Subject: Re: [wsrf] FW: Groups - oasis - Reminder to vote on
>ballot "Approve WS-ResourceProperties as Committee Spec., and
>send 5 specs to OASIS Standard vote?"
>
>
>David Snelling wrote:
>
>> Martin,
>>
>> Can you be a little more precise? Do we need to implement the version
>> before the vote, or commit to implement it.
>
> From the committee process document, before it can go out for member
>vote, the spec needs:
>"
>Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations
>that they are
>successfully using the specification;
>"
>
>The meaning of "using the spec" is left vague, and is up to the member
>to determine.
>
>
>
>Tom Rutt
>
>>
>> For example, Fujitsu Labs, is at PR1. We don't want to implement PR2,
>> only to re-do it again in a month based on the final spec. But we
>> will claim to use the final version available by say N
>months after
>> publication.
>>
>> On 18 Jan 2006, at 7:25, Martin Chapman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Apologies for missing the call on the 9th as I was in
>mid-air. I did
>>> read the minutes regarding the establishment of this ballot and I
>>> have one query before I am fully comfortable voting yes to this.
>>> Are there at least three organisations claiming to use the
>>> **latest** versions of these specs?
>>> This is a necessary pre-condition and I've not seen any indication
>>> (good or bad) on this topic for a while.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From:
>>> [mailto:]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:00 PM
>>> To:
>>> Subject: Groups - oasis - Reminder to vote on ballot "Approve
>>> WS-ResourceProperties as Committee Spec., and send 5 specs
>to OASIS
>>> Standard vote?"
>>>
>>>
>>> OASIS Web Services Resource Framework (WSRF) TC member,
>>>
>>> This is a reminder to vote on a ballot presented to OASIS Web
>>> Services Resource Framework (WSRF) TC. This ballot will close on
>>> Friday, 20 January 2006 @ 23:45 ET. To vote on this
>ballot, go here:
>>>
>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/ballot.php?id=926
>>>
>>> Please DO NOT REPLY to this email; instead, vote using the above
>>> link.
>>>
>>> The text of this ballot is as follows:
>>> ---
>>> "Approve WS-ResourceProperties as Committee Spec., and send 5 specs
>>> to OASIS Standard vote?" Shall the TC
>>> (a) approve version 1.0 of WS-ResourceProperties, at
>>>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/16164/
>>> wsrf-ws_resource_properties-1.2-spec-pr-02.c.doc, as a Committee
>>> Specification, and
>>> (b) send that spec, as well as the following four, for membership
>>> vote as an OASIS Standard?
>>> (1) WS-Resource, at
>>>
>http://www.oasis->open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/15484/
>>> wsrf-ws_resource-1.2-spec-pr-02.b.doc;
>>> (2) WS-ResourceLifetime, at
>>>
>http://www.oasis->open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/15538/
>>> wsrf-ws_resource_lifetime-1.2-spec-pr-02.c.doc;
>>> (3) WS-BaseFaults, at
>>>
>http://www.oasis->open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/15536/
>>> wsrf-ws_base_faults-1.2-spec-pr-02.a.doc
>>> (4). WS-ServiceGroup, at
>>>
>http://www.oasis->open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/15892/
>>> wsrf-ws_service_group-1.2-spec-pr-02.b.doc ?
>>>
>>> - Yes
>>> - No
>>> - Abstain
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Please vote at your earliest convenience by visiting the following
>>> URL:
>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/ballot.php?id=926
>>>
>>> If you believe that you have received this message in error, please
>>> contact oasis administration (). Thank you,
>>> OASIS Open Administration
>>>
>>>
>
>
>--
>----------------------------------------------------
>Tom Rutt email: ;
>Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
>
>
>
