Sorry for my mistake... :-) Yes, I mean ackPattern.
I understand. I am not very sure about my interpretation of future
extension is reasonable or not, in particular, not sure about whether my
thoughts align with the existing design philosophy or not. Anyway, I
raised that. Considering both future extension and consistency, I guess
extensibility may be of a higher priority.. :-)
Regards, -Patrick
> That's correct. But the comment I made was for ackPattern and not
> AckRequested.
> ackPattern is the new name for a previous attribute name 'synchronous'.
>
> But again even for ackPattern, it's not a MUST but rather a SHOULD
> for consistency
> sake.
>
> -Sunil
>
