Title: Message
Carsten,
I think where the confusion might lie is that the latest spec proposal
uses the approach that you outlined below: the portlet developer segregates its
information in the shared session. The other approach I outlined in the document
suggest that the portlet developer may want to use a completely separate session
per occurrence of a portlet. None of the approaches is necessarily better (I
outlined some of the pros/cons in the document). However, we need to ensure
that as we continue developing the spec, it will allow the portlet developer to
choose between those two options.
Eilon
-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Leue
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:06
AM
To: Michael Freedman
Cc: Eilon Reshef;
;
Subject: Re: [wsrp-interfaces] RE:
[wsia] Sessions
Mike -
I agree with Eilon's conclusion
to not enforce a maybe limiting session
sharing model
in WSRP. If we allow the consumer to group portlets to
different sessions we have the best of the two worlds: if required
portlets
can namespace data they do not want to share
even if there is a shared
session. They either use a
constant prefix or their entiy ID for this. Both
is
possible without any modifications of the interface proposed in the
draft spec. Parameters they want to share are not prefixed at
all or with a
prefix known to all participating
portlets.
Best regards
Carsten Leue
-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory B鐽lingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401
|---------+----------------------------->
|
| Michael
Freedman |
|
|
<Michael.Freedman@|
|
|
oracle.com> |
|
|
|
|
| 06/17/2002
07:22 |
|
|
PM
|
|
| Please respond
to |
|
| Michael
Freedman |
|
|
|
|---------+----------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
|
To: Eilon Reshef
<>
|
|
cc: Carsten Leue/Germany/IBM@IBMDE,
,
|
| Subject:
Re: [wsrp-interfaces] RE: [wsia]
Sessions
|
|
|
|
|
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Eilon,
Can you elaborate
on your conclusion that we shouldn't enforce a model?
I am not really sure how we can have our cake and eat it too.
Either our
model requires a key or its doesn't or its
a hybrid that allows both. I
would prefer not
doing that later as it seems messy in the interface (and
complicates it).
-Mike-
Eilon Reshef wrote:
Carsten and team,Attached are some
additional thoughts on sessions -
in particular how people may want to use
sessions in a different way
that I am not sure works very well with
our current approach.Eilon
-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Leue [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:16 AM
To:
wsia; WSRP; ;
Subject: [wsia] Sessions
As
promised (though a bit late) here is a sketch of my current
understanding of the notion of sessions.
(See
attached file: Sessions.zip)
Best
regards
Carsten Leue
-------
Dr.
Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory B鐽lingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401
