See my comments marked with [YT].
(Most of them are in appendix A, since it seems appendix a is the real definition of the spec, which I think is wrong, and is a result of what Rich mentioned below about the obscurity of the interface.)
The endless debate about putting WSIA concepts in the WSRP standard is still there...
Yossi.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:09 PM
To: ;
Subject: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] Refactoring the data objects
As requested in Tuesday's Joint interfaces call, I have reworked the draft
spec in an effort to factor the data items into the scopes presented at the
June F2F. Personally I think this obscures too much and that some of the
data items should move up to first class parameters in the interface.
Hopefully this version can provide a reasonable basis for a discussion of
which items should be promoted either for clarity or as part of supporting
any factoring of the operations.
Technical note: In order to make this readable but yet leave an indication
of what was modified, I accepted the changes and then appended a space on
the end of changed lines so that a change bar will appear on the left. So
much changed in Appendix A that it all should be considered modified.
(See attached file: WSIA - WSRP Interface Specification.doc)
