RE: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] mimeHeaders

Mime is an acronym for "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions" which seems to be more specific and less fitting then HTTP. maybe we should just call this requestHeaders.
I was wrong on the secureClientCommunications remark.

	Yossi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:46 PM
To: ; 
Subject: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] mimeHeaders



If choosing between 'httpHeaders' and 'mimeHeaders', I would tend to go
with the more general unless information would be lost.

If secureClientCommunications is already implied through mimeHeaders, I
would agree with dropping it. Is this specified explicitly, or just
inferred through the URI containing "https:"?

markupType ... it also looks to me like this is already specified via
mimeHeaders.



                                                                                                                    
                      "Tamari, Yossi"                                                                               
                      <yossi.tamari@sap        To:       ,                                 
                      .com>                                                     
                                               cc:                                                                  
                      07/15/2002 12:47         Subject:  RE: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] Refactoring the data objects   
                      PM                                                                                            
                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                    




See my comments marked with [YT].
(Most of them are in appendix A, since it seems appendix a is the real
definition of the spec, which I think is wrong, and is a result of what
Rich mentioned below about the obscurity of the interface.)

The endless debate about putting WSIA concepts in the WSRP standard is
still there...

      Yossi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:09 PM
To: ; 
Subject: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] Refactoring the data objects


As requested in Tuesday's Joint interfaces call, I have reworked the draft
spec in an effort to factor the data items into the scopes presented at the
June F2F. Personally I think this obscures too much and that some of the
data items should move up to first class parameters in the interface.
Hopefully this version can provide a reasonable basis for a discussion of
which items should be promoted either for clarity or as part of supporting
any factoring of the operations.

Technical note: In order to make this readable but yet leave an indication
of what was modified, I accepted the changes and then appended a space on
the end of changed lines so that a change bar will appear on the left. So
much changed in Appendix A that it all should be considered modified.

(See attached file: WSIA - WSRP Interface Specification.doc)




#### WSIA - WSRP Interface Specification1.doc has been removed from this
note on July 15 2002 by Rich Thompson





----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>