My problem statement is that "the v1 spec left where to carry user
profile items." Since there is nothing specified, there is no issue of
ambiguity.
Subbu
Rich Thompson wrote:
>
> In reflecting on this mornings call, I think Mike is right in that we
> have not well enough defined the problem we are working on and this is
> complicating discussing solutions. My summary of the problem statements
> I have heard is:
>
> Richard: The v1 metadata for custom user profiles items is insufficient
> to locate and understand the items (i.e. reasonably support mapping).
> Subbu: The v1 spec left where custom user profile items are placed
> ambiguous.
> Andre: The protocol should cleanly support user profile schemas defined
> outside the TC.
>
> I think Subbu's problem statement is a narrowing of Richard's with a
> strong indication of a preferred solution. I think Andre's statement is
> the broadest of the three proposed problem statements. If we can settle
> on which one(s) of these, if any, we are willing to accept as problems,
> it should help scope the discussion/solution in a productive manner.
>
> Rich
