← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
user profile proposal
Title: user profile proposal The following should allow alternative types of profile data to flow, making our old P3P based information one example of such profile descriptions: In 1.0 we had: <complexType name="UserContext"> <sequence> <element name="userContextKey" type="xsd:string" /> <element name="userCategories" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> <element name="profile" type="types:UserProfile" minOccurs="0" /> <element name="extensions" type="types:Extension" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> </sequence> </complexType> <element name="UserContext" type="types:UserContext" /> Proposal: Replace "profile" element in above with a "profiles" element (note different type and that mulitple occurances are now allowed): <element name="profiles" type="types:Profile" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> Where the new Profile type is defined as follows: <complexType name="Profile"> <sequence> <any /> </sequence> </complexType> We would also define a global "userProfile" element, as well as keep the (P3P) UserProfile type in our schema (could move UserProfile to separate useful types xsd): <element name="userProfile" type="types:UserProfile"/> This allows 0, 1 or many profiles to be communicated in the user context in <profiles> elements. The understanding is that all such profiles relate to the user. A specific usage is to communicate the 1.0 UserProfile data. This would now be carried in an element named "profiles" : <userContext> ... <profiles> <userProfile> … 1.0 P3P stuff ...</userProfile> <!-- note that userProfile element is NOT required to be here but some XML is. --> </profiles> … <extensions> … </extensions> ... </userContext> Possible types of profiles can be listed using ServiceDescription.customUserProfileItemDescriptions and RegistrationData.customUserProfileData. On reflection, I strongly prefer not to attempt to provide more meta data in the protocol related to user profiles. If a XML processor recognizes the namespaced elements it will already have the schema (if defined). Regards, Andre
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread