Mike,
Could you get the question of Ajax onto the agenda please? While
discussing some of the topics below in the email thread, ajax was
mentioned several times, and I suspect we will end up doing the same
tomorrow.
Subbu
Michael Freedman wrote:
> I have attached a document that lists 3 open discussion items from the
> wsrp list + the security topic. I suggest we spend a little time on the
> open issues but also make sure we have enough time to begin the security
> discussion. The topics have links to the mail threads so you can
> refamiliarize yourself.
> -Mike-
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> navigationalParameterDescriptions:
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/email/archives/200602/msg00027.html>
> Do we need to clarify language concerning consumers recognizing
> like-named navigational parameters as related/auto wired?
>
> Clarification: Resource URLs and markup params, etc.
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/email/archives/200602/msg00030.html>
>
> 1. Stateless consumer
> 2. Meaning of title?
> 3. Change window state/mode?
> 4. Concurrency problems with sessionID?
> 5. During *getMarkup, handleEvents *and *performBlockingInteraction*
> invocations the Consumer indicates to the Portlet its current mode
> via the MarkupParams data structure" Add getResource???
> 6. Clarity of structure vs reuse of structure -- Should we have
> specific types to clarify that a few fields are no sensible?
> 7. Caching when using getResource of portlet markup ???? Not yet
> raised ---
>
> unclear behavior for dynamic nav params and transient properties
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/email/archives/200602/msg00076.html>
> Why don't we allow nav params/transient props to be introduced
> dynamically like events? Should we?
>
> Security questions:
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-interfaces/email/archives/200602/msg00003.html>
> Can we recommend that all producers support at a minimum UserName with
> no consumer authentication? Can we encourage all consumer to send
> UserName with no consumer auth unless otherwise instructed to do
> otherwise? Will a producer work if it doesn't handle the WS stuff but
> receives it? I.e. will it just be ignored?
