Re: [wsrp-interfaces] Issue with current CachableResource proposal

I am for adding it -- also copying the wsrp list in case anyone isn't
on this one.

    -Mike-

Rich Thompson wrote:

  I think it is a good idea to enable
those Producers who can and are willing to enforce the restrictions.
  

  

  Any objections to adding this field
prior to the inclusion of the proposal into the draft?
  

  

Rich 
  

  

  

  
    
      

        Stefan
Hepper <>
        
        
03/14/2007 12:02 PM
        

        
        
        
          
            

              
              
To

              
              WSRP Interfaces
subgroup <>
              
            

            

              
              
cc

              
              

              
            

            

              
              
Subject

              
              [wsrp-interfaces]
Issue with current
CachableResource proposal
            

          
        
        

        
          
            

              
              

              
              

              
            

          
        
        

        
      

    
  
  

  

  

  While discussing in the JSR 286 EG how the
producer
may enforce the 

restrictions mentioned for the type FULL and PORTLET we noticed that
the
  

producer does not get any information back on a serve resource call 

about the cachability setting.

Therefore I propose to add the following on the ResourceParams type:

[O] string resourceCachability

  

providing the resourceCachability value set on the resource URL that 

triggered this getResource call. If this value is missing the default
is
  

that the cachability of the getResource call is of type PAGE.

  

Stefan