[wsrp-pfb] FW: [wsrp-interop] Reviewing wsrp-pfb-abstract-model-draft-05.doc

[Forwarding over to PFB email list.] Thanks
for the corrections. We should discuss details of how to make the note public on
the next PFB SC call but I would just make it available on our Web and
reference it when we publish (or meta-publish - publishing information about publishing?)
our registry tech notes. 

 

Regards,

Andre

 

From: Rich Thompson
[mailto:] 

Sent: 20 May 2004 21:22

To:


Subject: [wsrp-interop] Reviewing
wsrp-pfb-abstract-model-draft-05.doc

 

This is looking quite good to me! 

Since
this document has been changed into being guidance for the authors of
registry-specific mapping documents, it seems like it primary audience is
within the PFB SC. While the nature of OASIS is still to make it accessible to
the public, what do we want to call it? How broadly to trumpet its approval by
the TC? 

Nits
I noticed when reading through the Abstract model document are: 

 
Page 2, line 40;
     "PBF" should be "PFB" 

 
Page 5, line 7;
     "describes" should be "described" 

 
Page 7, line 28;
     "WSPR" should be "WSRP"

Rich