Sorry, I didn't get around to this before your meeting today. From your
prior message to me this week you seem to think we need a major revision
to our CSS classes. I suggest this be evaluated/discussed at the whole
TC level with respect to its impact on 1.0. I.e. do you have a
version/revision/upgrade plan? Would it be better to delay 1.0 in lieu
of the future changes and just improve it now?
Anyway can you add this to this/next weeks TC agenda -- I sure don't
want to release 1.0 if we think a portion of it is damaged yet don't
have an upgrade plan.
-Mike-
Rex Brooks wrote:
> Thanks for the note, Rich. We will take note of this, and discuss it.
>
> Ciao,
> Rex
>
> At 7:54 AM -0400 6/11/03, Rich Thompson wrote:
>
>> Rex,
>>
>> I will not be able to make today's call as I need to take a son to a
>> doctor appointment.
>>
>> I do intend to regularly participate in the markup SC and am
>> particularly interested in the CSS class discussion. As a basic
>> reminder, the portlet-table-* set of classes were created because
>> people found the mapping of the more general portlet-section-*
>> classes to be problematic. We should debate whether changing the
>> descriptions in the spec are worth it at this time (we would need to
>> recommend the exact changes as an errata item) or whether elaborated
>> discussion in the primer will suffice for v1.
>>
>> Rich Thompson
>
>
>
