[wsrp-wsia] [I#145] Should our sample implementation only implementJSR 168?

Issue: 145
Status: Active
Topic: 
general
Class: Technical
Raised by: Michael Freedman
Title: Should our 
sample implementation only implement JSR 168?
Date Added: 
3-Nov-2002
Document Section:   -
Description:    
The last proposal was for the WSRP sample implementation to support both JSR 168 
and a proprietary Java container mechanism.  Now that JSR 168 is 
equal/ahead of us shouldn't we only publish a sample that implements JSR 168?