Thomas Schaeck wrote:
> We have to be very careful here since we have two different kinds of
> entities - it would make sense to rename "producer offered entities" to
> "portlets", but I don't think it would make sense to use the term "portlet"
> for "consumer configures entity".
But since a consumer configured entity is similar to a producer offered
entity outside the entity management interface, why does the same term
not apply to such entities? Am I missing something?
Regards,
Subbu
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS on 12/09/2002 06:33:29 PM
>
> To:
> cc:
> Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] [I#154] Proposed Resolution: Rename "entity" to
> "portlet"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This was a question we said at the Nov F2F that we would allow to sit for a
> few weeks. Seeing as there have been no replies to this issue, I propose
> that we resolve it by renaming entities to portlets throughout the spec.
> This aligns with the name of the spec and thereby will help guide the
> spec's readers.
>
> Rich Thompson
>
>
>
>
> Gil Tayar
> <Gil.Tayar@webcol To:
>
> lage.com> cc:
> Subject: [wsrp-wsia]
> [I#154] Rename "entity" to "portlet" or
> 11/24/2002 06:50 "portlet type"
> AM
>
>
>
>
>
> Issue: 154
> Status: Active
> Topic: general
> Class: Technical
> Raised by: Eilon Reshef
> Title: Rename "entity" to "portlet" or "portlet type"
> Date Added: 7-Nov-2002
> Document Section:
> Description:
> As the word "entity" is too general, and because we have finally given a
> name to the thing that we are "showing", why not rename entity to "portlet"
> or "portlet type"
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
