← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #36] MarkupType.markupType

From
Darsten Meue
Date
2003-01-27T05:27:31+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #36] MarkupType.markupType
From a programming perspective it would be easier to have just one
markupType as this may be used as a key. We could rather allow the "*" to
denote multiple markup types like in section 6.1.8 in the markupParams
structure.

Best regards
Carsten Leue

-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory B鐽lingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401

                                                                           
             Rich                                                          
             Thompson/Watson/I                                             
             BM@IBMUS                                                   To 
                                             
             01/24/2003 03:26                                           cc 
             PM                                                            
                                                                   Subject 
                                       [wsrp-wsia] [change request #36]    
                                       MarkupType.markupType               
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           

Document: spec & wsdl
Section: 5.1.10
Page/Line: 22/4 & 10
Requestedby: Michael Freedman
Old text: [R] string markupType
Proposed text: [R] string markupTypes[]
Reasoning: To reduce verbosity shouldn't we allow a portlet to define the
N markup types for which the remainder of the structure applies?  Or do
folks think that this is such a rare case that not dealing with an array
is a better form?

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →