Title: Message
agreed, but this can be automated for the most part.
For example, the service could include a legacy web application and convert the
markup to xhtml with an html parser.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eilon Reshef
[mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002
11:58 AM
To: 'PAVLIK,GREGORY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)'; 'Thomas Schaeck';
'Takao Mohri'
Cc: 'WSRP Mailing List (E-mail)'
Subject: RE:
[wsrp][markup] First conference call (Summary)
I do believe we have to offer a migration path for
people that have or even prefer plain old HTML - expecting everybody to go back
to their Perl scripts and JSP templates and rework them might provide a barrier
to entry that we can avoid by simply supporting HTML.
-----Original Message-----
From: PAVLIK,GREGORY
(HP-NewJersey,ex2) [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday,
April 10, 2002 11:48 AM
To: 'Thomas Schaeck'; Takao
Mohri
Cc: PAVLIK,GREGORY (HP-NewJersey,ex2); WSRP Mailing List
(E-mail)
Subject: RE: [wsrp][markup] First conference call
(Summary)
Is there a general statement on whether the markup
subcommittee intends to
treat HTML and XHTML
interchangeably? My initial thought was that WSRP would
do better to standardize on XHTML, which would have a number of
advantages
including the ability of the consumer to
treat the fragment as an XML
fragment. It's not
terribly difficult to tidy up a piece of HTML and
repurpose it as well-formed/valid XHTML when dealing with legacy
content. An
early focus on XHTML might position us
better for dealing with devices in
the long run, as it
appears that WML and cHTML are going to be secondary
targets for the TC.
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From:
Thomas Schaeck [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:43 PM
To: Takao Mohri
Cc: PAVLIK,GREGORY
(HP-NewJersey,ex2); WSRP Mailing List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [wsrp][markup] First conference call (Summary)
There is not something like "the markup language of WSRP", the
WSRP
protocol needs not to be tied to any particular
markup language, the
protocol and the markup exchanged
can be viewed as orthogonal.
However, WSRP will need to define rules for valid markup
fragments and
common styles with the priorities
1. (X)HTML
2. WML, cHTML,
VoiceXML...
It would be interesting to see the rules that would define
valid XHTML
Basic fragments.
Takao, could you post an XHTML Basic example document to the
mailing list
and an outline of fragment rules for
XHTML Basic ? Which tags would be
allowed in
aggregatable XHTML Basic fragments and which tags would not be
allowed to use in fragments ?
Best regards,
Thomas
Takao Mohri <> on 04/09/2002
01:26:58 PM
Please respond to Takao Mohri
<>
To: "PAVLIK,GREGORY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)"
<>
cc:
"WSRP Mailing List (E-mail)" <>
Subject: Re: [wsrp][markup] First
conference call (Summary)
Greg,
Yes, as you mentioned, XHTML Basic is becoming a standard for
cellular
phones.
In WAP 2.0,
XHTML Mobile Profile (an extention of XHTML Basic) is a
standard markup language. In Japan, cellular phones that support WAP
2.0
are already on sale by KDDI. NTT Docomo also has
announced support of WAP
2.0.
In the near future, WAP 2.0, i.e, XTHML Basic will be used by many
mobile
devices.
If the markup language of WSRP is based on XHTML Basic,
it makes support of mobile devices much easier.
Regards,
Takao
"PAVLIK,GREGORY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" wrote:
>
> Gino,
>
> Could you clarify if your intent is
to consider XHMTL/XHTML Basic as a
part
> of the HTML focus? This wasn't clear from the notes.
There appears to be
a
>
broad convergence in the mobile space, both with respect to WML and NTT
> Docomo, to standardizing on XHTML Basic + CSS. XHTML is
going to be here
on
> the
device very soon, perhaps quicker than on the desktop, making this a
> relatively high priority item. Fujitsu may have some
comments on this as
> well.
>
> Greg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gino Filicetti [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:22 PM
> To: WSRP Mailing List (E-mail)
>
Subject: [wsrp][markup] First conference call (Summary)
>
> Team,
>
> Attached are the meeting notes from
today's Markup Subcommittee meeting.
> Comments and
suggestions are welcome.
>
> One thing I did notice was that there were quite a few
participants today
> that aren't on the actual list
of official members for this team. Since
this
> team is quite small, I think it'd be great if we could
get some of you to
> officially join and help out
with the effort. Unfortunately, I wasn't
able
> to capture the names of ALL the attendees this time
around (I'll be sure
to
>
record the con-call next time), but please send me an email so we can
add
> your name to official list and flesh out the
team a little more.
>
>
Currently, the official list is:
>
> Gino Filicetti
> David Taieb
> Khurram Mahmood
> Susan
Levine
> Michael Hillerman
>
> Thanks,
>
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
> Gino Filicetti | Software
Engineer
> One Harbour Place, Portsmouth, NH
03801
> T 603.559.1692 |
> w w w . b o w s t r e e
t . c o m
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the
subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
// Takao MOHRI ()
// FUJITSU LABORATORIES LTD.
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the
subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the
subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
