Title: Message
Carsten,
A small concern I have regarding your point below.
Meta-data that defined inter-relationships between portlets doesn't seem
simple, nor does it seem intuitive to me that the fundamental way in which a
portal interacts with a set of portals depends on meta-data (and I'm talking
about a sequence of invocations, not about the type of information passed, which
is what meta-data is good for).
I would much rather have the notion of session sharing either (a)
disappear (b) be in a one-to-one relation with a service (c) be one-to-one with
a session, but managed by the portlet group (who don't need to publish this
information) (d) be explicit in the protocol in some other unidentified
way.
Eilon
[CL]
The idea was that the producer
indicates session sharing capabilities
through its
metadata (e.g. by defining categories, etc). However this has
not been detailed yet.
The producer itself is a
container of services.
[CL]
