Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [wsrp] [wsia] New Spec version
Rich, Here are some things I noticed on scanning the (0.93) wsdl. Let's have a wrsp-webservices call on Wed to discuss. Also, if we have time, we could also go over the proposed charter for this subgroup on the call (see attached message for proposed charter and this message's end for call details). regards, Andre --------------------------------------------------- 1. We still have the actionTemplate and secureActionTemplate element in the Template element (wsrp_v1_types.xsd). 2. [R] UpdateResponse.navigationalState We decided to make the nav state nillable? It is still required in spec and minOccurs="1" (by default) in wsrp_v1_types.xsd. 3. <element name="methodGetSupported" type="xsd:boolean" default="false" /> Everywhere else we add a minOccurs="0" if we have a default. Let's add it here too. 4. <attribute name="portletHandle" type="string" use="required"/> in DestroyFailed. Using an attribute decides the rules for encoding a portlet handle as a string! Suggest we consider making this an element (only changes wsrp_v1_types.xsd not the spec). 5. <element name="desiredLocales" type="xsd:string" nillable="true" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> This is just wierd, as one can legally send the following: <request> <desiredLocales isnil="true"/> <desiredLocales isnil="true"/> <desiredlLocales>ga</desiredlocales> ... </request> 6. Need to remove the comment on ModelDescription's ref="xsd:schema" from wsrp_v1_types.wsdl 7. In Chapter 14, we never say what our URIs are: urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:intf urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:bind Maybe we should add a comment to the wsdl? --------------------------------------------------- WSRP Description and Transport Issues Wednesdays, 7 am PST / 10 am EST / 4 pm CET, 1 hour US dial in #: 1.888.481.3032 International Dial in #: 1.617.801.9600 Participant Passcode: 28614774 (you will be asked for your name) UK 0800 904 7961 D 0800 1813856
Next in thread →
Next in month →