Fw: spec question and > 1.0 items

Forwarding private comments for basis
of references

Rich Thompson

----- Forwarded by Rich
Thompson/Watson/IBM on 07/09/2003 02:40 PM -----

Andre Kramer <>

05/09/2003 07:23 AM
        

        To:
       Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS

        cc:
       Andre Kramer <>

        Subject:
       RE: spec question and > 1.0 items

       

Rich,

I also just noticed that we have some maxOccurs="unbounded" in:

<complexType name="Contact">

                
                 <sequence>

                
                 
               
<element name="postal" type="types:Postal"

minOccurs="0" />

                
                 
               
<element name="telecom" type="types:Telecom"

minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />

                
                 
               
<element name="online" type="types:Online"

minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />

                
                 
               
<element name="extensions" type="types:Extension"

minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />

                
                 </sequence>

                
</complexType>

<complexType name="Online">

                
                 <sequence>

                
                 
               
<element name="email" type="xsd:string"

minOccurs="0" />

                
                 
               
<element name="uri" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0"

maxOccurs="unbounded" />

                
                 
               
<element name="extensions" type="types:Extension"

minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />

                
                 </sequence>

                
</complexType>

Contact.telecom, Contact.online, Online.uri are not arrays in the IDL.

Should remove the maxOccurs as these build [] stubs.

woops...

>  -----Original Message-----

> From:                
 Andre Kramer  

> Sent:                
09 May 2003 11:16

> To:                
'Rich Thompson'

> Cc:                
Andre Kramer

> Subject:              
  spec question and > 1.0 items

> 

> 6.1.17 has UserProfile.bdate while ch 11 has bDate in table. Seems
it

> should be bdate?

> 

> With the "resource URL rewrite return boolean" deferred
item could you

> add?

> 

> - Allow negotiation between consumer and producer as to whether resource

> proxying is needed.

> - Should we allow wsrp-url values to be relative (rather than absolute)?

> 

> regards,

> Andre

>