So I [producer] can't have policies that assign different lifetimes passed
on user category or profile information? Certainly not a common use but
why would we prevent?
-Mike-
Rich Thompson wrote:
I would argue against the lifetime operations
taking a user context as the underlying resources are not user-specific and
the Consumer is the right control point for deciding whether or not the end-user
is allowed to see or impact the lifetime.
Rich
Andre Kramer <>
12/22/2004 10:34 AM
To
Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS,
"''" <>
cc
Subject
RE: [wsrp]
Issue #33: Pass UserContext to lifetime operations?
I had considered portlet handle
leasing ops taking in a user context but then the question of whether a consumer
leases on a per user basis would arise. The call arg would then typically
set to null, as seems to happen a lot given the questions surrounding userContexts
in operations. But easy to add if we think it is required for consistency.
Regards,
Andre
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:]
Sent: 21 December 2004 16:55
To:
Subject: [wsrp] Issue #33: Pass UserContext to lifetime operations?
Issue # 33
Spec section:
SubCommittee: Interfaces
Owner: Andre
Description: Should the RegistrationLifetime and PortletLifetime
portTypes' operations take a userContext for consistency?
