RE: [wsrp] Issue #29: Is metadata needed to indicate support forgetResource?

From
Andre Kramer <>
Date
2004-12-22T15:24:12+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsrp] Issue #29: Is metadata needed to indicate support forgetResource?
forgetResource (subject)? Forward or
backwards interop can be by degrading the HTML or falling back to HTTP but I
would encourage 2.0 (consumer) implementations to support getResource and 2.0
producers to also provide a 1.0 service. 

 

Regards,

Andre

 

From: Michael Freedman
[mailto:] 

Sent: 21 December 2004 17:55

To: 

Subject: Re: [wsrp] Issue #29: Is
metadata needed to indicate support forgetResource?

 

And vice-versa:  so a producer can adapt to run in a 1.0 consumer.

Rich Thompson wrote:

Issue
# 29 

Spec section:

SubCommittee:
Interfaces 

Owner: Andre

Description: Isn't metadata
needed to tell a Consumer whether or not a Producer supports getResource (or is
it always supported if urls encode for it and Consumers never invoke it unless
a url has encoded wsrp-useOperation=true)?