← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [wsrp] Issue #43: Collapse HandleEventResponseandBlockingInteractionResponse?
We do need two XML elements in order to stick to a SOAP response naming convention where the response = operationName + “Response” but XML Schema type communality or extensibility could be looked at. We have an action to do this for all 2.0 types at some point now that XML Schema extension is better supported .. you did all verify this against your tool chain I hope :-) Regards, Andre From: Rich Thompson [mailto:] Sent: 07 March 2005 17:08 To: Subject: [wsrp] Issue #43: Collapse HandleEventResponseandBlockingInteractionResponse? Issue # 43 Spec section: SubCommittee: Interfaces Owner: Rich (raised by Artem Spector) Description: HandleEventResponse and BlockingInteractionResponse are identical, but defined as two distinct types, why is this?
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →