← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [wsrp] Issue #43: Collapse HandleEventResponseandBlockingInteractionResponse?

From
Andre Kramer <>
Date
2005-03-07T17:28:55+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsrp] Issue #43: Collapse HandleEventResponseandBlockingInteractionResponse?
We do need two XML elements in order to
stick to a SOAP response naming convention where the response = operationName +
“Response” but XML Schema type communality or extensibility could
be looked at. We have an action to do this for all 2.0 types at some point now
that XML Schema extension is better supported .. you did all verify this against
your tool chain I hope :-)

 

Regards,

Andre

 

From: Rich Thompson
[mailto:] 

Sent: 07 March 2005 17:08

To: 

Subject: [wsrp] Issue #43:
Collapse HandleEventResponseandBlockingInteractionResponse?

 

Issue
# 43

Spec section:

SubCommittee: Interfaces

Owner: Rich (raised by Artem Spector)

Description: HandleEventResponse and
BlockingInteractionResponse are identical, but defined as two distinct types, why
is this?
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →