← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [wsrp-comment] Is v2 backward compatible ?
The service wsdl is provided as an example only. Producer are free to name their service endpoints in any manner they choose ... There are other subtleties that would keep a v1 Consumer from using a v2 Producer. The largest of these is the types existing in a different namespace as the versioning issues with WSDL and XML Schema are the nicest. When the TC discussed this issue, the common thought was that most v2 Producers would also expose v1 endpoints since once one moves above the wire format, v2 is an extension of v1. Rich Thompson OASIS WSRP TC Chair IBM T.J. Watson Research Center / Hawthorne, NY From: Rajesh T <> To: Date: 10/24/2007 06:33 AM Subject: [wsrp-comment] Is v2 backward compatabile ? Hi, Was just going through the v2 pr-03 wsdl. Looks like v2 is not backward compatible with v1 ? For Eg: In the v1 : The WSRP Service is defined as, <wsdl:service name="WSRPService"> While in v2 it is as <wsdl:service name="WSRP_v1_Service"> This would mean all that a v1 consumer cannot be configured to use a v2 producer, without any code changes/recompilation of consumer ? regards Rajesh T This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the OASIS Web Services for Remote Portlets (WSRP) TC. In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required before posting. Subscribe: Unsubscribe: List help: List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrp-comment/ Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=wsrp
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →