← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [wsrp-comment] Is v2 backward compatible ?

From
Rich Thompson <>
Date
2007-10-24T11:51:05+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [wsrp-comment] Is v2 backward compatible ?
The service wsdl is provided as an example
only. Producer are free to name their service endpoints in any manner they
choose ...

There are other subtleties that would
keep a v1 Consumer from using a v2 Producer. The largest of these is the
types existing in a different namespace as the versioning issues with WSDL
and XML Schema are the nicest. When the TC discussed this issue, the common
thought was that most v2 Producers would also expose v1 endpoints since
once one moves above the wire format, v2 is an extension of v1.

Rich Thompson

OASIS WSRP TC Chair

IBM T.J. Watson Research Center / Hawthorne, NY

From:
Rajesh T <>

To:


Date:
10/24/2007 06:33 AM

Subject:
[wsrp-comment] Is v2 backward compatabile
?

Hi,

   Was just going through the v2 pr-03  wsdl. Looks like  v2
 is not 

backward compatible  with v1 ?

 

For Eg: In the v1 :

 

The WSRP Service is defined as,

 <wsdl:service name="WSRPService">

While in v2 it is as

<wsdl:service name="WSRP_v1_Service">

This would mean all that a v1 consumer cannot be configured to use a v2

producer, without any code changes/recompilation of consumer ?

regards

Rajesh T

This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the

OASIS Web Services for Remote Portlets (WSRP) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and

to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required

before posting.

Subscribe: 

Unsubscribe: 

List help: 

List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrp-comment/

Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf

List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php

Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=wsrp
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →