RFC on "Related Work" for v1.1.1

I currently took Monica’s suggestion and added a reference to our charter adding information about the numbering scheme…and as I was applying modifications to the documents, I had two questions for clarification/debate:

 

I have something like this for “Related Work”:

Related work:

This specification replaces or supercedes:

·         Web Services Security Kerberos Token Profile 1.1 OASIS Standard incorporating Approved Errata, 01 November 2006

This specification is related to:

·         Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security 1.1 (WS-Security 2004) OASIS Standard incorporating Approved Errata, 01 November 2006

 

Q1: Should we modify the second bullet point to reference the 1.1.1 specification of SOAP Message Security? 

Related work:

This specification replaces or supercedes:

·         Web Services Security Kerberos Token Profile 1.1 OASIS Standard incorporating Approved Errata, 01 November 2006

This specification is related to:

·         Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security 1.1.1  Day Month, Year 

 

Q2:  I don’t see an Approved Errata for Username Token Profile – should I reference it as the base 1.1 document?  I have it thusly:

Related work:

This specification replaces or supercedes:

·         Web Services Security Username Token Profile 1.1 OASIS Standard, 1 February 2006

This specification is related to:

·         Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security 1.1 (WS-Security 2004) OASIS Standard incorporating Approved Errata, 01 November 2006

Perhaps I should place it under the second bullet, so it reads:

Related work:

This specification is related to:

·         Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security 1.1 (WS-Security 2004) OASIS Standard incorporating Approved Errata, 01 November 2006

·         Web Services Security Username Token Profile 1.1 OASIS Standard, 1 February 2006

 

 

 

­­­­­­­_______________________

Carlo Milono

Director of Engineering - Program Management

TIBCO Software Inc.

Direct: +1(650) 846-5152

mailto: