I would imagine that the first step is to see if there are any compatibility, impacts, issues, etc. Has anyone done this ?
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
<>
<>
08/10/2005 02:27 PM
To
<>
cc
<>
Subject
[wss] Comment on WSS Core 1.1
Given that xml:id is at Proposed Recommendation status [1] and likely to
be a W3C Recommendation close following the end of the public review
period for WSS 1.1, I propose we explicitly list xml:id in the core
document in Section 4, "ID References".
Although this section does not preclude the use of xml:id, to avoid
ambiguity it would be preferable to add xml:id to the list explicitly.
The specific proposal is to add "xml:id" as a bullet point after line
499 in the public review draft (on a new line between lines 499 and 500
in the latest WSS editorial draft [3]) and to add a reference to the W3C
recommendation.
We may decide to delay standardization for a few weeks to allow xml:id
to advance to Recommendation status.
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/PR-xml-id-20050712/
[2]
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13397/wss-v1.1-spec-pr
-SOAPMessageSecurity-01.pdf
[3]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/download.php/13961/wss-
v1.1-spec-draft-SOAPMessageSecurity-01.pdf
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
