I agree with Frederick, we should add xml:id to the related section of core.
Ron
wrote:
> Given that xml:id is at Proposed Recommendation status [1] and likely to
> be a W3C Recommendation close following the end of the public review
> period for WSS 1.1, I propose we explicitly list xml:id in the core
> document in Section 4, "ID References".
>
> Although this section does not preclude the use of xml:id, to avoid
> ambiguity it would be preferable to add xml:id to the list explicitly.
>
> The specific proposal is to add "xml:id" as a bullet point after line
> 499 in the public review draft (on a new line between lines 499 and 500
> in the latest WSS editorial draft [3]) and to add a reference to the W3C
> recommendation.
>
> We may decide to delay standardization for a few weeks to allow xml:id
> to advance to Recommendation status.
>
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/PR-xml-id-20050712/
>
> [2]
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13397/wss-v1.1-spec-pr
> -SOAPMessageSecurity-01.pdf
>
> [3]
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/download.php/13961/wss-
> v1.1-spec-draft-SOAPMessageSecurity-01.pdf
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
--
