Re: [xacml-comment] Incomplete: behavior if <Obligations> present butnot supported

do you mean the pEp? the pDp need not understand an Obligation since it is imposed upon the pEp as part of enforcement of the decision, not on the pDp as a consequence of making the decision.

e.g. 
decision: PERMIT
obligation: STRONGENCRYPT

make sense?

b

Anne Anderson wrote:

>The behavior of a PDP that does not support the optional
> element when presented with a Policy containing
> is not specified.
>
>Possible behavior: if a Policy or PolicySet is Applicable to a
>Request and the Policy or PolicySet contains , but
>the PDP does not support , that the PDP MUST return
>"Deny".
>
>Anne Anderson