Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [xacml-comment] The type of the RequestContextPath attribute
For example, /xml[2] is not a valid URI. Satoshi Hada IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory mailto: |---------+----------------------------> | | Satoshi | | | Hada/Japan/IBM@IB| | | MJP | | | | | | 2002/11/19 15:34 | | | | |---------+----------------------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: XACML COMMENT <> | | cc: | | Subject: [xacml-comment] The type of the RequestContextPath attribute | | | | | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| The current type of the RequestContextPath attribute is xs:anyURI. (Section 5.31) I don't think that a valid XPath expression is always a valid URI (according to RFC2396). So I think the type should be xs:string rather than xs:anyURI. Please correct me if I'm wrong. In the XML-Signature specification, the type of XPath expressions is xs:string. Satoshi Hada IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory mailto: ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
Next in thread →
Next in month →