[xacml-comment] Comment on use-case document

Looking at: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xacml/repository/draft-xacml-usecase-01a.pdf

I see the following definition in the first use-case:

[[
Nonreputable signature.
A signature signed in such a fashion that the signer couldn't refute it. 
See, for example, the XMLD specification for which there is a link below.
]]

This seems like an odd choice of terminology.  Non-refutable or 
nonrepudiable (or non-repudiable, non-repudiatable?) seem closer to the 
intent here.

Nonreputable sounds rather like disreputable.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<>