← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
PIP - comments/questions
Hi,
I've a few comments/questions regarding to XACML. If this is the
wrong mailing list, let me know.
The most XACML-Implementations, that I saw, integrated the
PIP's into the PDP. I think that is no good solution, but the
devs had not choice:
On the one hand the meaning of the context handler isn't really
described as importent as I guess it is. On the other hand there
is no XML/JSON-specification how to request a PIP. So when PDP
and PEP/context handler are on two machines, then the PIP has to
be on the the PDP machine and cannot be on a third machine (e.g.
as microservice).
Why is there no detailed PIP definition?
It's not really clear defined what's the recommended way to
retreive missing attributes in XACML. PIP's or Response Status
Detail?
I think it would be usefull, if an AttributeDesignator has an
optional "_expression_" and "expressionType" attribute, so PIP's
could use them for SQL-queries or Spring _expression_ Language
etc.
Why are VariableDefinitions only for policies and not
policySets?
thank you and best regards
Benedict
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →