| 1 |
Public Comment |
138 |
Nov 2003 |
| 2 |
XACML Obligations - a concurrency model |
18 |
Nov 2008 |
| 3 |
Attribute Array in JSON Request |
18 |
Feb 2018 |
| 4 |
What is "URI equality" ? |
11 |
Oct 2011 |
| 5 |
Multiple decision result of type xpathExpression |
10 |
Aug 2013 |
| 6 |
Features for XACMLv3 |
9 |
Nov 2008 |
| 7 |
[xacml-comment] C003 and matching in targets and conditions |
8 |
Nov 2002 |
| 8 |
15-day public review for XACML v3.0 Errata 01 - ends March 9th |
8 |
Feb 2017 |
| 9 |
[xacml-comment] 5.31 Element <AttributeSelector> |
7 |
Nov 2002 |
| 10 |
Invitation to comment on XACML V3.0 Errata 01 - ends June 16th |
7 |
Jun 2017 |
| 11 |
XACML standard |
7 |
Dec 2017 |
| 12 |
[xacml-comment] D002 |
6 |
Nov 2002 |
| 13 |
[xacml-comment] D024 |
6 |
Nov 2002 |
| 14 |
[xacml-comment] IIC051 |
6 |
Dec 2002 |
| 15 |
[xacml-comment] A question about how to evaluate a policy set |
6 |
Jan 2003 |
| 16 |
Policies vs. Rules |
6 |
Mar 2009 |
| 17 |
Requirements on the Construction of XML Data Structures for XPath Processing |
6 |
May 2012 |
| 18 |
Re: [xacml-comment] Public review comments for xacml-json-http-v1.0-csprd03: 5.2.5 The StatusCode object representation |
6 |
Oct 2014 |
| 19 |
[xacml-comment] IIB008Policy.xml is invalid |
5 |
Nov 2002 |
| 20 |
[xacml-comment] E001, E002 |
5 |
Nov 2002 |
| 21 |
[xacml-comment] A002 |
5 |
Nov 2002 |
| 22 |
[xacml-comment] XACML 1.0 Committee Specification Comments |
5 |
Dec 2002 |
| 23 |
[xacml-comment] Comment on condition element |
5 |
Dec 2002 |
| 24 |
who should use XACML? |
5 |
Sep 2008 |
| 25 |
Possible typos in XACML 3.0 Core specification (SubjectCategory, PolicyIdentifierList) |
5 |
May 2016 |
| 26 |
60-day Public Review for REST Profile of XACML 3.0 - Conformance issues |
5 |
Dec 2017 |
| 27 |
[xacml-comment] Target merging and matching |
4 |
Jul 2002 |
| 28 |
[xacml-comment] draft 15 : '@' is wildcard? |
4 |
Aug 2002 |
| 29 |
[xacml-comment] Test IIB025 |
4 |
Nov 2002 |
| 30 |
[xacml-comment] A schema error (<Status> in <Result>) |
4 |
Jan 2003 |
| 31 |
Two comments on XACML Implementers Guide |
4 |
Apr 2003 |
| 32 |
Re: [xacml-comment] Extended Indeterminate values in the case ofPolicy Targets returning Indeterminate |
4 |
Jan 2011 |
| 33 |
The x500Name-match function is not clearly defined |
4 |
Jan 2011 |
| 34 |
A Problem with the "delegated:" Prefix |
4 |
May 2012 |
| 35 |
Query Regarding XACML Delegation Profile v1.0 (16 April, 2009) |
4 |
Feb 2015 |
| 36 |
[xacml-comment] Section A12 |
3 |
Nov 2002 |
| 37 |
[xacml-comment] A schema bug? |
3 |
Nov 2002 |
| 38 |
[xacml-comment] RE: XACML questions ... |
3 |
Nov 2002 |
| 39 |
[xacml-comment] Updated Conformance Test Suite |
3 |
Nov 2002 |
| 40 |
[xacml-comment] D025-D028 |
3 |
Nov 2002 |
| 41 |
[xacml-comment] no rules or policies |
3 |
Nov 2002 |
| 42 |
[xacml-comment] B010, B028, B029 |
3 |
Dec 2002 |
| 43 |
[xacml-comment] Section A.6. Function "expression" |
3 |
Dec 2002 |
| 44 |
[xacml-comment] Multiple Request Subject elements |
3 |
Dec 2002 |
| 45 |
[xacml-comment] D006 & D008 |
3 |
Jan 2003 |
| 46 |
[xacml-comment] jiffy xacml |
3 |
Jan 2003 |
| 47 |
re: alternative "isCallerInRole" implementation/model |
3 |
Jun 2004 |
| 48 |
More questions about new version 2.0 |
3 |
Jul 2004 |
| 49 |
examples in profile specs |
3 |
Oct 2008 |
| 50 |
Version matching for a PolicySetIdReference |
3 |
Oct 2008 |
| 51 |
Re: [xacml-comment] AttributeSelector initial context as resourcenode |
3 |
Oct 2008 |
| 52 |
ipAddress-regexp-match |
3 |
Oct 2008 |
| 53 |
hierarchical node id datatype |
3 |
Jan 2009 |
| 54 |
Inadequate identification of LDAP attributes |
3 |
Dec 2010 |
| 55 |
Multiple Decision Requests During Reduction |
3 |
Jun 2011 |
| 56 |
Broken Rule in Privacy Policy Profile |
3 |
Feb 2012 |
| 57 |
[tab] Comments on XACML MAP Authorization Profile V1.0 |
3 |
Jan 2014 |
| 58 |
Rant continues... |
3 |
Dec 2017 |
| 59 |
[xacml-comment] Attribute designators |
2 |
Aug 2002 |
| 60 |
[xacml-comment] xpath-match |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 61 |
[xacml-comment] An editorial comment on the XACML 1.0 document |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 62 |
[xacml-comment] xs:time |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 63 |
[xacml-comment] resubmission: v_1.0 - niggling editorial nuggets |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 64 |
[xacml-comment] followup to xs:time comment |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 65 |
[xacml-comment] present function |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 66 |
[xacml-comment] a few typos |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 67 |
[xacml-comment] ...IsPresent and Qualified... |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 68 |
[xacml-comment] Urn versus urn |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 69 |
[xacml-comment] missing functions in 10.3.8 |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 70 |
[xacml-comment] The namespace URI for XACML data types |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 71 |
[xacml-comment] The footnote 1 in Appendix A.4 |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 72 |
[xacml-comment] IIB026 |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 73 |
[xacml-comment] The type of the RequestContextPath attribute |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 74 |
[xacml-comment] equality & set/bag functions |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 75 |
[xacml-comment] IIB017Policy.xml |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 76 |
[xacml-comment] IIB0{21,23,24,25}Request.xml |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 77 |
[xacml-comment] IIB043Policy.xml |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 78 |
[xacml-comment] IIB033Policy.xml |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 79 |
[xacml-comment] IIC023*.xml,... |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 80 |
[xacml-comment] IIC165Policy.xml |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 81 |
[xacml-comment] IIC082Policy.xml |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 82 |
[xacml-comment] IIC150, IIC154 |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 83 |
[xacml-comment] IID025, IID026, IID027, IID028 |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 84 |
[xacml-comment] IIB005's response is wrong? |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 85 |
[xacml-comment] Resource types |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 86 |
[xacml-comment] IIC165 |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 87 |
[xacml-comment] IIC167 |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 88 |
[xacml-comment] Two different URIs for access-subject |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 89 |
[xacml-comment] Environment attributes |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 90 |
[xacml-comment] Subject Category URIs in testcases |
2 |
Nov 2002 |
| 91 |
[xacml-comment] Comment on use-case document |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 92 |
[xacml-comment] another resource question |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 93 |
[xacml-comment] A009 |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 94 |
[xacml-comment] A014, A015 |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 95 |
[xacml-comment] IIB010 |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 96 |
[xacml-comment] static type and syntax errors in Conformance Tests |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 97 |
[xacml-comment] Test IIB045 - Only contains a single resource |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 98 |
[xacml-comment] 12/11/02 XACML 1.0 Conformance Test Suite updated |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 99 |
[xacml-comment] IIA011Request.xml |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 100 |
[xacml-comment] IIC003 v IIC012 v IIC014 StatusCodes |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 101 |
[xacml-comment] A comment on A 14.2 Arithmetic functions |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 102 |
[xacml-comment] When to obtain attributes from the PIP. |
2 |
Dec 2002 |
| 103 |
[xacml-comment] Section 8.1mentions QNames |
2 |
Jan 2003 |
| 104 |
[xacml-comment] About the syntax of <Obligation> in Section 5.35 |
2 |
Jan 2003 |
| 105 |
[xacml-comment] Comments and questions on Obligations (Appendix C.1,C.2, and C.3). |
2 |
Jan 2003 |
| 106 |
[xacml-comment] Question about subject element |
2 |
Jan 2003 |
| 107 |
[xacml-comment] XACML software |
2 |
Jan 2003 |
| 108 |
How to combine multiple policy sets? |
2 |
Apr 2003 |
| 109 |
Re: [xacml-comment] xpath-node-match and IIIG004Policy.xml |
2 |
May 2003 |
| 110 |
Comment on XACML 1.1 draft 4 |
2 |
Aug 2003 |
| 111 |
FW: XACML: Access Control for Web Services |
2 |
Oct 2003 |
| 112 |
tests II B 30, II B 31 |
2 |
Oct 2003 |
| 113 |
Re: problem with conformance tests |
2 |
Mar 2004 |
| 114 |
Question on XACMLand SAML |
2 |
May 2004 |
| 115 |
Some observations |
2 |
Jun 2004 |
| 116 |
CombinerParameters element |
2 |
Jul 2004 |
| 117 |
Signature profile |
2 |
Jan 2006 |
| 118 |
A edit suggestion on XACML admnistrative policy |
2 |
Jul 2006 |
| 119 |
Add <Rule> evaluation description |
2 |
Jul 2006 |
| 120 |
empty target evaluation |
2 |
Sep 2008 |
| 121 |
AttributeSelector initial context as resource node |
2 |
Oct 2008 |
| 122 |
XACML grammar in Relax NG |
2 |
Dec 2008 |
| 123 |
File names for the xacml files and saml files |
2 |
Jan 2009 |
| 124 |
XACML 3.0 wd 7 |
2 |
Feb 2009 |
| 125 |
Request for Change XACML 3.0 |
2 |
Feb 2010 |
| 126 |
Inconsistent definition for the any-of-all function |
2 |
Jan 2011 |
| 127 |
Re: [xacml-comment] Specification of extended indeterminate in combiningalgorithms is incomplete |
2 |
Mar 2011 |
| 128 |
Reduction Should Use Extended Indeterminate Values |
2 |
Jun 2011 |
| 129 |
Permissable function arguments for the any-of-any function |
2 |
Jan 2012 |
| 130 |
XPathCategory During Reduction |
2 |
May 2012 |
| 131 |
Suggestion for the XACML MAP Authorization Profile and others |
2 |
Jul 2014 |
| 132 |
Minor typo in XACML MAP Authorization Profile |
2 |
Jul 2014 |
| 133 |
Automatic conversion of XACML 2.0 to 3.0 policies |
2 |
Jun 2015 |
| 134 |
PIP - comments/questions |
2 |
Jan 2018 |
| 135 |
[xacml-comment] Identifying attribute issuers |
1 |
Jun 2002 |
| 136 |
[xacml-comment] Hi, why XACML does not specify the target data model? |
1 |
Jun 2002 |
| 137 |
[xacml-comment] Hi, questions about XACML, please help |
1 |
Jun 2002 |
| 138 |
[xacml-comment] XACML Context |
1 |
Jul 2002 |
| 139 |
[xacml-comment] test 1 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 140 |
[xacml-comment] Inconsistent specification of <*Match> elements and-match functions |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 141 |
Re: [xacml-comment] Inconsistent specification of <*Match> elementsand -match functions |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 142 |
[xacml-comment] IIB027 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 143 |
[xacml-comment] The PolicySet Schema (Line 1759--1762) |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 144 |
[xacml-comment] No description about the PolicyDefaults element |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 145 |
[xacml-comment] conformance tests (NotApplicatble or Not-Applicabale) |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 146 |
[xacml-comment] NotApplicable |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 147 |
[xacml-comment] Another A.12 comment |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 148 |
Re: [xacml-comment] conformance tests (NotApplicatble orNot-Applicabale) |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 149 |
[xacml-comment] xacml:Policy:XpathVersion mandatory-to-implement? |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 150 |
[xacml-comment] Incomplete: behavior if <Obligations> present but notsupported |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 151 |
[xacml-comment] INCOMPLETE: behavior when XPath encountered,but not supported |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 152 |
[xacml-comment] C.3 First-Applicable policy-combining alg inconsistent |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 153 |
Re: [xacml-comment] Incomplete: behavior if <Obligations> present butnot supported |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 154 |
[xacml-comment] Section 5.24 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 155 |
[xacml-comment] Line 308: The SAML prefix |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 156 |
[xacml-comment] Comments on the prefix xf |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 157 |
[xacml-comment] Line numbering is inconsistent |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 158 |
[xacml-comment] Function Identifiers in Section 10.3.8 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 159 |
[xacml-comment] The prefix "function:" is used in Section 4 Examples |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 160 |
[xacml-comment] The prefix "function:" is used in Appendix A |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 161 |
[xacml-comment] The default value of the MustBePresent attribute(Section 5.26) |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 162 |
[xacml-comment] Problems understanding XACML spec. Forwarded messagefrom Graham Klyne. |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 163 |
[xacml-comment] Re: Problems understanding XACML spec |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 164 |
[xacml-comment] map function |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 165 |
[xacml-comment] XCAML Spec version 1.0 - Example 2, Rule 1 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 166 |
[xacml-comment] The identifiers are wrong in Appendix A.2 and B.4 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 167 |
[xacml-comment] Primitive type identifiers in B.4. |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 168 |
[xacml-comment] About subject category attributes |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 169 |
[xacml-comment] A wrong URI in Section 5.30 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 170 |
[xacml-comment] subject-category as attribute, rather than <Attribute> |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 171 |
[xacml-comment] Section 6.2 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 172 |
[xacml-comment] Schema file names are inconsistent |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 173 |
[xacml-comment] A comment on Section 7.3 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 174 |
[xacml-comment] There is no Section describing<SubjectAttributeDesignator> |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 175 |
[xacml-comment] "type" in Line 3503 in the pdf file is broken |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 176 |
[xacml-comment] "Not Match" or "No-match" (Tables 1, 2, and 3) |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 177 |
[xacml-comment] policy and rule ordering |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 178 |
[xacml-comment] C.4 "Only-one-applicable" inconsistent with B.10"only-one-applicable-policy" |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 179 |
[xacml-comment] [xacml] error conditions. Forwarded message from billparducci. |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 180 |
[xacml-comment] XQO |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 181 |
[xacml-comment] The URI prefix for subject categories |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 182 |
[xacml-comment] Conventional XML namespace prefixes |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 183 |
[xacml-comment] Section 10.3.1 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 184 |
[xacml-comment] A general comment on the conformance testcases |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 185 |
[xacml-comment] Making MatchId and FunctionId argument order the same |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 186 |
[xacml-comment] Actions taken on XACML Comments, 11/21/02 and 11/25/02 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 187 |
Re: [xacml-comment] Actions taken on XACML Comments,11/21/02 and 11/25/02 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 188 |
[xacml-comment] IIC168, IIC169 |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 189 |
[xacml-comment] syntactic errors in XACML schemas |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 190 |
[xacml-comment] -01.xsd or -1.0.xsd |
1 |
Nov 2002 |
| 191 |
[xacml-comment] Response to XACML 1.0 comments |
1 |
Dec 2002 |
| 192 |
[xacml-comment] SubjectCategory XML attribute:string or URI? |
1 |
Dec 2002 |
| 193 |
[xacml-comment] editorial change in Comments |
1 |
Dec 2002 |
| 194 |
[xacml-comment] <StatusCode Value= type> |
1 |
Dec 2002 |
| 195 |
[xacml-comment] resource question & comment |
1 |
Dec 2002 |
| 196 |
[xacml-comment] Section 8.2 "Extensible XACML attribute types" needsrevision |
1 |
Dec 2002 |
| 197 |
[xacml-comment] The data type of the SubjectCategory attribute |
1 |
Dec 2002 |
| 198 |
[xacml-comment] Element <Description> |
1 |
Dec 2002 |
| 199 |
[xacml-comment] Comment resolutions |
1 |
Dec 2002 |
| 200 |
[xacml-comment] More intentional static type errors in ConformanceTests |
1 |
Dec 2002 |
