Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xacml-users] Automatic conversion of XACML 2.0 to 3.0 policies/requests

From
Chester Ensign <>
Date
2015-05-29T11:30:47+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [xacml-users] Automatic conversion of XACML 2.0 to 3.0 policies/requests
The better mailing list to contribute it to the Technical Committee is . You subscribe by sending an empty message to . xacml-comment@ is meant specifically for outside feedback and contributions to the TC. 

/chet

 

On May 28, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Hal Lockhart <> wrote:

You might consider joining the OpenAz project, now located in the Apache Incubator.

 

Unfortunately the Apache web site is not up yet. Here is the previous one.

 

http://www.openliberty.org/wiki/index.php/OpenAz_Main_Page

 

Here is the Apache proposal (which was accepted).

 

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenAZProposal

 

The XACML TC also would accept it as a contribution. If you are not an OASIS member, you can contribute it by posting it to this mailing list ().

 

Hal

 

From: Cyril [mailto:] Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 8:50 AMTo: : [xacml-users] Re: Automatic conversion of XACML 2.0 to 3.0 policies/requests

 

Hello,

for anyone interested, I ended up writing my own XSLT file for XACML 2.0-to-3.0 Policy conversion. I published it temporarily:http://catalogue.fiware.org/sites/default/files/storage/enablers/xacml2to3.xsl

Maybe there is a better place to publish it (OASIS XACML website?). Anyway, it has a few limitations, as explained in comments inside that file. Besides, I noticed different behaviors depending on the XSLT processor, so I just want to inform that I tested only with Xalan and Saxon (HE) implementations.

Any improvement, patch, etc. is welcome of course.

Regards,

Cyril Dangerville

 

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Cyril <> wrote:

Hello,

I need to convert a significant number of XACML 2.0 PolicySets and Requests to XACML 3.0 equivalents.

Has anybody used or developed a XSLT, or any tool, to help with this task? And would be willing to share with the community, of course.

Thanks for your help.

Regards,

Cyril
Next in thread → Next in month →