RE: [xacml] Attribute and AttributeDesignator for XACML...

this is my recollection as well.

b

On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 10:10, Carlisle Adams wrote:

> My recollection is that we decided that we probably did not need
> MajorVersion, MinorVersion, AssertionID, Conditions, or Advice for XACML (it
> seems highly unlikely that anyone would write a rule/policy in which an
> attribute was qualified by a MinorVersion or an Advice element, whereas it
> is certainly possible that someone would want to qualify an attribute by
> Issuer).  So, making them more compact is certainly one goal.
> 
> However, given that we're defining the "Holder" schema, we do have the
> freedom to make other changes if we want (e.g., not using the NameQualifier
> and Format attributes).  My preference is not to make such changes lightly
> (i.e., unless it seems critically important), but we do have this freedom...
> 
> Carlisle.
>