← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

FW: Ammendment to Resolution of MI-1-03,was: RE: [xacml] BATCH # 2: E-mail vote to close issues...

From
Hal Lockhart <>
Date
2002-04-10T20:27:49+00:00
ID
Thread
FW: Ammendment to Resolution of MI-1-03,was: RE: [xacml] BATCH # 2: E-mail vote to close issues...
Title: FW: Ammendment to Resolution of MI-1-03, was: RE: [xacml] BATCH #2:  	E-mail vote to close issues...

Forwarded on behalf of Annie.

(I guess I have been in this business too long. I keep thinking MITM Attack! ;-)

Hal

-----Original Message-----

From: Anne Anderson [mailto:]

Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:48 AM

To: Hal Lockhart

Cc: Anne Anderson

Subject: Re: Ammendment to Resolution of MI-1-03, was: RE: [xacml] BATCH

#2: E-mail vote to close issues...

[Hal: Could you forward this to the list?  My e-mail

configuration is temporarily not allowing me to send directly to

the list. -aha]

I accept your amendment: it more clearly expresses what I had in

mind and what I think the TC decided on.

Anne

On 10 April, Hal Lockhart writes: Ammendment to Resolution of MI-1-03, was: RE: [xacml] BATCH #2:       E-mail vote to close issues...

...

 > This is what I have a problem with:

 > 

 > >Second, each predicate in a 

 > > <target> must refer to only one of <subject>, <resource>, and 

 > > <action> (for indexing purposes).

...

 > Proposed wording:

 > 

 > Second, each target must contain at most one each of <subject>, <resource>

 > and <action> mapping predicate, which in turn may match multiple actual

 > runtime values.

-- 

Anne H. Anderson             Email: 

Sun Microsystems Laboratories

1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928

Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →